Usage Score
6.5
Player Dossier
2023-2025Michigan State
Ademola Faleye
TE • 6'7" • 253 lbs • Brockton, MA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Ademola Faleye reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60
Consistency
64.8
Season Value
50.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Washington State
232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Michigan State • Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ademola Faleye, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Washington State. Ademola Faleye reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Washington State paired 23 primary output with 38.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Washington State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Michigan State
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
9
Efficiency
60
Usage
6.5
Consistency
64.8
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Game-by-Game Trend
12
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 4. Purdue: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
All Games9 · n=2
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Purdue
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Washington State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Michigan State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Michigan State | 18 | 60 | 6.5 | 18 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington State | 23 | 38.9 | 6.7 | 5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
14
Primary metric
14 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 36.7 efficiency score.
#4
Ohio State
4
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
4 receiving yards with a 26.7 efficiency score.
#5
Colorado State
2
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
2 receiving yards with a 13.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Washington State
23 primary output · 38.9 efficiency · 6.7 usage
51.4
#2
2024 Regular Season · Michigan State
50.1
18 primary · 60 efficiency · 6.5 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Michigan State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
41
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.