Usage Score
32.6
Player Dossier
2010-2011Air Force
Zack Kauth
WR • 6'5" • Dayton, OH, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Zack Kauth reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
91.8
Consistency
51.5
Season Value
69
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Air Force
10101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Air Force
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zack Kauth, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Air Force. Zack Kauth reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Air Force paired 620 primary output with 91.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 91.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Air Force
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
51.7
Efficiency
91.8
Usage
32.6
Consistency
51.5
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 77. Unknown: 19. TCU: 41. Unknown: 31. Navy: 31. Notre Dame: 13. San Diego State: 40. Boise State: 93. New Mexico: 17. Army: 45. UNLV: 90. Colorado State: 123
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 4 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 63.3. TCU: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 51.7. Navy: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 1 by 86.7. San Diego State: 2 by 100. Boise State: 3 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Army: 2 by 100. UNLV: 5 by 100. Colorado State: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins61.2 · n=5 · +8.4 vs Losses
Losses52.8 · n=5 · -8.4 vs Wins
First Half35.3 · n=6 · -32.7 vs Second Half
Second Half68 · n=6 · +32.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | vs Toledo | L 41-42 | — | 4 | 77 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ Colorado State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-21 | — | 3 | 123 | 41 | 41 | 3 | 50 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UNLV | W 45-17 | — | 5 | 90 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Army | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ New Mexico | W 42-0 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Boise State | L 26-37 | — | 3 | 93 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 51 |
| Fri 10/14 | vs San Diego State | L 27-41 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Notre Dame | L 33-59 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Navy | W 35-34 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 31 | 7.8 | 7.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs TCU | L 19-35 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2010-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Postseason | Air Force | 274 | 89.5 | 33.1 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 274 | 89.5 | 33.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Air Force | 620 | 91.8 | 32.6 | 346 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 620 | 91.8 | 32.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UNLV
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Colorado State
123
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boise State
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UNLV
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Air Force
620 primary output · 91.8 efficiency · 32.6 usage
69
#2
2011 Regular Season · Air Force
69
620 primary · 91.8 efficiency · 32.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Air Force
59
274 primary · 89.5 efficiency · 33.1 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
894
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.