Usage Score
18.5
Player Profile
Connor Dietz
QB • 6'0" • Columbus, OH, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Connor Dietz is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
66.6
Consistency
72.6
Season Value
64.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Air Force
0910111212
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Air Force
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Air Force
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Connor Dietz, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Air Force. Connor Dietz is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Air Force paired 1,800 primary output with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · Air Force
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
138.5
Efficiency
66.6
Usage
18.5
Consistency
72.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 15. Unknown: 216. Michigan: 188. UNLV: 158. Colorado State: 111. Navy: 142. Wyoming: 233. New Mexico: 119. Nevada: 207. Army: 222. San Diego State: 105. Hawai'i: 47. Fresno State: 37
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 9 by 40.7. Unknown: 18 by 93.2. Michigan: 33 by 63. UNLV: 24 by 65.5. Colorado State: 15 by 72.3. Navy: 22 by 70.3. Wyoming: 23 by 85.9. New Mexico: 14 by 89.5. Nevada: 20 by 84.5. Army: 27 by 59.9. San Diego State: 25 by 51.3. Hawai'i: 14 by 33.6. Fresno State: 11 by 56
Split Comparison
Wins143.4 · n=5 · +19.5 vs Losses
Losses123.9 · n=7 · -19.5 vs Wins
First Half151.9 · n=7 · +29.0 vs Second Half
Second Half122.8 · n=6 · -29.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
93.2 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Rice | L 14-33 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 40.7 | 6 | 11 | 1.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ Fresno State | L 15-48 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | 56 | 7 | 5 | 0.70 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Hawai'i | W 21-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.6 | 14 | 47 | 3.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ San Diego State | L 9-28 | 7 | 11 | 63 | 63.6 | 0 | 1 | 51.3 | 14 | 42 | 3 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Army | L 21-41 | 10 | 17 | 185 | 58.8 | 0 | 2 | 59.9 | 10 | 37 | 3.70 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Nevada3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 48-31 | 6 | 7 | 139 | 85.7 | 2 | 0 | 84.5 | 13 | 68 | 5.20 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs New MexicoDual-threat | W 28-23 | 4 | 4 | 61 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 89.5 | 10 | 58 | 5.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ WyomingDual-threat | W 28-27 | 7 | 9 | 141 | 77.8 | 2 | 0 | 85.9 | 14 | 92 | 6.60 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs NavyDual-threat | L 21-28 | 8 | 12 | 90 | 66.7 | 1 | 0 | 70.3 | 10 | 52 | 5.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Colorado StateDual-threat | W 42-21 | 2 | 5 | 57 | 40.0 | 2 | 0 | 72.3 | 10 | 54 | 5.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ UNLVDual-threat | L 35-38 | 3 | 9 | 90 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 65.5 | 15 | 68 | 4.50 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ MichiganDual-threat | L 25-31 | 10 | 19 | 127 | 52.6 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 14 | 61 | 4.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 8 | 11 | 142 | 72.7 | 0 | 0 | 93.2 | 7 | 74 | 10.60 | 1 | 49 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Air Force
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Air Force | 566 | 56.1 | 16.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Air Force | 124 | 51.3 | 6.7 | -442 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Air Force | 380 | 75.3 | 13.6 | 256 |
| 2012 Postseason | Air Force | 1,800 | 66.6 | 18.5 | 1,420 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Air Force | 1,800 | 66.6 | 18.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wyoming
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
233
Primary metric
233 total offense with 85.9 efficiency.
#2
New Mexico
104
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
104 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Utah
162
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
162 total offense with 64.6 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
216
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
216 total offense with 93.2 efficiency.
#5
Nevada
207
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
207 total offense with 84.5 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Air Force
1,800 primary output · 66.6 efficiency · 18.5 usage
64.4
#2
2012 Regular Season · Air Force
64.4
1,800 primary · 66.6 efficiency · 18.5 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Air Force
46.8
380 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
18
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,870
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.