Usage Score
13.2
Player Profile
Josh Cuevas
TE • 6'3" • 256 lbs • Los Angeles, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Josh Cuevas reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.7
Consistency
69.6
Season Value
63.9
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama
232324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Washington
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Josh Cuevas, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Alabama. Josh Cuevas reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Alabama paired 411 primary output with 72.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington, Alabama.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Alabama
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.3
Efficiency
72.7
Usage
13.2
Consistency
69.6
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 35. Oklahoma: 35. Florida State: 31. UL Monroe: 14. Wisconsin: 22. Georgia: 24. Vanderbilt: 35. Missouri: 28. Tennessee: 33. South Carolina: 16. LSU: 58. Oklahoma: 80
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 4 by 58.3. Oklahoma: 3 by 77.8. Florida State: 3 by 68.9. UL Monroe: 2 by 46.7. Wisconsin: 3 by 48.9. Georgia: 2 by 80. Vanderbilt: 3 by 77.8. Missouri: 2 by 93.3. Tennessee: 2 by 100. South Carolina: 3 by 35.6. LSU: 4 by 96.7. Oklahoma: 6 by 88.9
Split Comparison
Wins29.4 · n=9 · -19.2 vs Losses
Losses48.7 · n=3 · +19.2 vs Wins
First Half26.8 · n=6 · -14.8 vs Second Half
Second Half41.7 · n=6 · +14.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ Indiana | L 3-38 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 12/20 | @ Oklahoma | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Oklahoma | L 21-23 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 11/9 | vs LSU | W 20-9 | — | 4 | 58 | 13 | 14.50 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ South Carolina | W 29-22 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Tennessee | W 37-20 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Missouri | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Vanderbilt | W 30-14 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Georgia | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-14 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UL Monroe | W 73-0 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Florida State | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 1 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington
2023
Opening stop
- 2
Alabama
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Washington | 164 | 100 | 3.6 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Washington | 164 | 100 | 3.6 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Alabama | 218 | 64.6 | 9.6 | 54 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Alabama | 218 | 64.6 | 9.6 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Alabama | 411 | 72.7 | 13.2 | 193 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Alabama | 411 | 72.7 | 13.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
24
Primary metric
24 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma
80
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
80 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
46
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Arizona
57
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Alabama
411 primary output · 72.7 efficiency · 13.2 usage
63.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Alabama
63.9
411 primary · 72.7 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Alabama
49.7
218 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 9.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
793
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 30 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.