Usage Score
29.8
Player Dossier
2024-2025Washington State
Zevi Eckhaus
QB • 6'0" • 209 lbs • Culver City, CA, USA
Pass-first distributorVolume operator
Zevi Eckhaus is a pass-first distributor with 29.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
59.2
Consistency
82.9
Season Value
68
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington State
24242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zevi Eckhaus, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington State. Zevi Eckhaus is a pass-first distributor with 29.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Washington State paired 2,463 primary output with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 59.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Washington State
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
223.9
Efficiency
59.2
Usage
29.8
Consistency
82.9
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 368. North Texas: 75. Washington: 287. Colorado State: 219. Ole Miss: 236. Virginia: 216. Toledo: 233. Oregon State: 170. Louisiana Tech: 202. James Madison: 197. Oregon State: 260
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 58 by 54.8. North Texas: 13 by 60. Washington: 46 by 55.3. Colorado State: 36 by 62.7. Ole Miss: 42 by 63.1. Virginia: 37 by 56.6. Toledo: 37 by 54.7. Oregon State: 40 by 46.6. Louisiana Tech: 36 by 66.9. James Madison: 38 by 57.9. Oregon State: 37 by 72.3
Split Comparison
Wins256.4 · n=5 · +59.6 vs Losses
Losses196.8 · n=6 · -59.6 vs Wins
First Half233.5 · n=6 · +21.1 vs Second Half
Second Half212.4 · n=5 · -21.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
72.3 vs Oregon State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/22 | @ Utah State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 34-21 | 26 | 44 | 334 | 59.1 | 3 | 3 | 54.8 | 14 | 34 | 2.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Oregon StateDual-threat | W 32-8 | 17 | 28 | 197 | 60.7 | 1 | 0 | 72.3 | 9 | 63 | 7 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ James Madison | L 20-24 | 19 | 31 | 171 | 61.3 | 1 | 1 | 57.9 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Louisiana Tech3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 28-3 | 17 | 25 | 146 | 68.0 | 1 | 0 | 66.9 | 11 | 56 | 5.10 | 2 | 16 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Oregon State | L 7-10 | 13 | 24 | 146 | 54.2 | 0 | 2 | 46.6 | 16 | 24 | 1.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Toledo3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 28-7 | 10 | 22 | 159 | 45.5 | 2 | 2 | 54.7 | 15 | 74 | 4.90 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Virginia | L 20-22 | 18 | 27 | 183 | 66.7 | 1 | 2 | 56.6 | 10 | 33 | 3.30 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Ole Miss | L 21-24 | 24 | 31 | 218 | 77.4 | 2 | 0 | 63.1 | 11 | 18 | 1.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Colorado State | W 20-3 | 16 | 28 | 189 | 57.1 | 2 | 0 | 62.7 | 8 | 30 | 3.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Washington3+ TD | L 24-59 | 25 | 36 | 277 | 69.4 | 2 | 2 | 55.3 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ North Texas | L 10-59 | 7 | 10 | 72 | 70.0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Postseason | Washington State | 452 | 74.2 | 35.5 | — |
| 2024 Regular Season | Washington State | 452 | 74.2 | 35.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Washington State | 2,463 | 59.2 | 29.8 | 2,011 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington State | 2,463 | 59.2 | 29.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Game with 279 yards of offense and 86.5 efficiency.
279
Primary metric
279 total offense with 86.5 efficiency.
#2
UNLV
319
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
319 total offense with 79.2 efficiency.
#3
Akron
80
Primary metric
Game with 80 yards of offense and 52.5 efficiency.
80 total offense with 52.5 efficiency.
#4
Syracuse
391
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
391 total offense with 62.3 efficiency.
#5
Utah State
368
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
368 total offense with 54.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Washington State
2,463 primary output · 59.2 efficiency · 29.8 usage
68
#2
2025 Regular Season · Washington State
68
2,463 primary · 59.2 efficiency · 29.8 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Washington State
47.5
452 primary · 74.2 efficiency · 35.5 usage
Milestones
6
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,915
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 16 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.