Usage Score
36
Player Dossier
2021-2025UTEP
Tyrin Smith
WR • 5'7" • 173 lbs • Cibolo, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Tyrin Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.6
Consistency
68.8
Season Value
69.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP
212122232425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- UTEP • Cincinnati • Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyrin Smith, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · UTEP. Tyrin Smith reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
UTEP paired 1,047 primary output with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2022 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTEP, Cincinnati, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
87.3
Efficiency
82.6
Usage
36
Consistency
68.8
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 71. North Texas: 127. New Mexico State: 64. New Mexico: 183. Boise State: 25. Charlotte: 106. Louisiana Tech: 48. Florida Atlantic: 70. Middle Tennessee: 117. Rice: 79. Florida International: 58. UTSA: 99
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 8 by 59.2. North Texas: 7 by 100. New Mexico State: 5 by 85.3. New Mexico: 8 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 83.3. Charlotte: 4 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 6 by 53.3. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 10 by 78. Rice: 6 by 87.8. Florida International: 5 by 77.3. UTSA: 4 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins64.6 · n=5 · -38.8 vs Losses
Losses103.4 · n=7 · +38.8 vs Wins
First Half96 · n=6 · +17.5 vs Second Half
Second Half78.5 · n=6 · -17.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | @ UTSA | L 31-34 | — | 4 | 99 | 20.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Florida International | W 40-6 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 17 |
| Thu 11/3 | @ Rice | L 30-37 | — | 6 | 79 | 10.9 | 13.20 | 0 | 37 |
| Sun 10/30 | vs Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 13-24 | — | 10 | 117 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 24-21 | — | 7 | 70 | 10.6 | 10 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 31-41 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Charlotte100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 41-35 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 2 | 58 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Boise State | W 27-10 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-27 | — | 8 | 183 | 20.9 | 22.90 | 0 | 76 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs New Mexico State | W 20-13 | — | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ OklahomaHigh volume | L 13-45 | — | 8 | 71 | 8.9 | 8.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 8/28 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards | L 13-31 | — | 7 | 127 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 1 | 49 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Cincinnati
2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Texas State
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202120212022202320242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | UTEP | 570 | 76.9 | 17.5 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | UTEP | 570 | 76.9 | 17.5 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,047 | 82.6 | 36 | 477 |
| 2023 Regular Season | UTEP | 191 | 67.8 | 30.9 | -856 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 32 | 60 | 6.9 | -159 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas State | 0 | — | — | -32 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
183
Primary metric
183 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
91
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · UTEP
1,047 primary output · 82.6 efficiency · 36 usage
69.9
#2
2021 Postseason · UTEP
51.4
570 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · UTEP
51.4
570 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 17.5 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
3
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,840
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.