Usage Score
22.7
Player Dossier
2021-2024UCF
Kaedin Robinson
WR • 6'2" • 205 lbs • Arden, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Kaedin Robinson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
68.8
Season Value
69.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · App State
2122232324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UCF • App State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kaedin Robinson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · App State. Kaedin Robinson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
App State paired 840 primary output with 94.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UCF, App State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · App State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
64.6
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
22.7
Consistency
68.8
Best Game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 118. Unknown: 64. North Carolina: 33. East Carolina: 57. Wyoming: 51. UL Monroe: 112. Coastal Carolina: 10. Old Dominion: 103. Southern Miss: 27. Marshall: 55. Georgia State: 29. James Madison: 68. Georgia Southern: 108. Troy: 70
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 8 by 98.3. Unknown: 4 by 100. North Carolina: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 4 by 95. Wyoming: 3 by 100. UL Monroe: 10 by 74.7. Coastal Carolina: 2 by 33.3. Old Dominion: 7 by 98.1. Southern Miss: 1 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 91.7. Georgia State: 4 by 48.3. James Madison: 4 by 100. Georgia Southern: 8 by 90. Troy: 6 by 77.8
Split Comparison
Wins71.8 · n=8 · +18.4 vs Losses
Losses53.4 · n=5 · -18.4 vs Wins
First Half63.6 · n=7 · -2.1 vs Second Half
Second Half65.7 · n=7 · +2.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs James Madison
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/16 | vs Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 13-9 | — | 8 | 118 | 13.2 | 14.80 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Troy | L 23-49 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Georgia Southern100 receiving yards · High volume | W 55-27 | — | 8 | 108 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 2 | 27 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ James Madison2+ TD | W 26-23 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Georgia State | W 42-14 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Marshall | W 31-9 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Southern Miss | W 48-38 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Old Dominion100 receiving yards | L 21-28 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Tue 10/10 | vs Coastal Carolina | L 24-27 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 10/1 | @ UL Monroe100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-40 | — | 10 | 112 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Wyoming | L 19-22 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs East Carolina | W 43-28 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ North Carolina | L 34-40 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCF
2021
Opening stop
- 2
App State
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20212022202320232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | UCF | 30 | 100 | 3.6 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | App State | 435 | 73.5 | 13.8 | 405 |
| 2023 Postseason | App State | 905 | 86.2 | 22.7 | 470 |
| 2023 Regular Season | App State | 905 | 86.2 | 22.7 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | App State | 840 | 94.4 | 28.6 | -65 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
118
Primary metric
118 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia State
121
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Old Dominion
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Old Dominion
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · App State
840 primary output · 94.4 efficiency · 28.6 usage
77.5
#2
2023 Postseason · App State
69.4
905 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 22.7 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · App State
69.4
905 primary · 86.2 efficiency · 22.7 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,210
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.