Usage Score
18.1
Player Dossier
2023-2025Ohio State
Carnell Tate
WR • 6'3" • 195 lbs • Chicago, IL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Carnell Tate reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.4
Consistency
71.1
Season Value
65
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ohio State
232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carnell Tate, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Ohio State. Carnell Tate reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Ohio State paired 875 primary output with 90.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Nebraska
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
15
Receiving Yards / G
48.9
Efficiency
86.4
Usage
18.1
Consistency
71.1
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 35. Texas: 87. Oregon: 10. Tennessee: 18. Akron: 58. Western Michigan: 45. Marshall: 64. Michigan State: 52. Oregon: 13. Nebraska: 102. Penn State: 15. Purdue: 56. Northwestern: 52. Indiana: 68. Michigan: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Texas: 7 by 82.9. Oregon: 1 by 66.7. Tennessee: 1 by 100. Akron: 4 by 96.7. Western Michigan: 3 by 100. Marshall: 4 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 100. Oregon: 1 by 86.7. Nebraska: 4 by 100. Penn State: 2 by 50. Purdue: 6 by 62.2. Northwestern: 4 by 86.7. Indiana: 4 by 100. Michigan: 6 by 64.4
Split Comparison
Wins50.9 · n=13 · +15.4 vs Losses
Losses35.5 · n=2 · -15.4 vs Wins
First Half46.1 · n=8 · -5.9 vs Second Half
Second Half52 · n=7 · +5.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Nebraska
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/21 | @ Notre Dame | W 34-23 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 1/11 | @ Texas | W 28-14 | — | 7 | 87 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 18 |
| Wed 1/1 | @ Oregon | W 41-21 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 12/22 | vs Tennessee | W 42-17 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Michigan | L 10-13 | — | 6 | 58 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Indiana | W 38-15 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Northwestern2+ TD | W 31-7 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Purdue | W 45-0 | — | 6 | 56 | 10.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Penn State | W 20-13 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Nebraska100 receiving yards | W 21-17 | — | 4 | 102 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 1 | 40 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Oregon | L 31-32 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Michigan State | W 38-7 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Marshall | W 49-14 | — | 4 | 64 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 56-0 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Akron | W 52-6 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Ohio State | 264 | 77 | 8.5 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Ohio State | 264 | 77 | 8.5 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Ohio State | 733 | 86.4 | 18.1 | 469 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Ohio State | 733 | 86.4 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Ohio State | 875 | 90.1 | 20.7 | 142 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ohio State | 875 | 90.1 | 20.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
183
Primary metric
183 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Purdue
79
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 82.9 efficiency score.
#5
Penn State
124
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Ohio State
875 primary output · 90.1 efficiency · 20.7 usage
68.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Ohio State
68.2
875 primary · 90.1 efficiency · 20.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Ohio State
65
733 primary · 86.4 efficiency · 18.1 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9699
IMG Academy · Bradenton, FL
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,872
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.