Usage Score
16.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025Oregon
Teitum Tuioti
LB • 6'3" • 263 lbs • Laie, HI, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Teitum Tuioti shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
39.2
Consistency
66.2
Season Value
43.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Oregon
232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Teitum Tuioti, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Oregon. Teitum Tuioti shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Oregon paired 30.5 primary output with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Oregon
Games
15
Havoc Plays / G
2.0
Efficiency
39.2
Usage
16.7
Consistency
66.2
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112131415
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 0. Texas Tech: 4. James Madison: 3. Unknown: 1. Oklahoma State: 2.5. Northwestern: 1. Oregon State: 1.5. Penn State: 2. Indiana: 2. Rutgers: 2.5. Wisconsin: 0.5. Iowa: 2. Minnesota: 3. USC: 1. Washington: 4.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 2 by 8.3. Texas Tech: 6 by 65. James Madison: 3 by 42.5. Unknown: 5 by 30.8. Oklahoma State: 4 by 41.7. Northwestern: 6 by 35. Oregon State: 3 by 27.5. Penn State: 5 by 40.8. Indiana: 4 by 36.7. Rutgers: 3 by 37.5. Wisconsin: 5 by 25.8. Iowa: 9 by 57.5. Minnesota: 3 by 42.5. USC: 5 by 30.8. Washington: 5 by 65.8
Split Comparison
Wins2.3 · n=12 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses1 · n=2 · -1.3 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=8 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half2.2 · n=7 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
15 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
65.8 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/10 | @ Indiana | L 22-56 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | @ Texas Tech2+ sacks · Splash game | W 23-0 | 6 | 6 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/21 | vs James Madison | W 51-34 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ WashingtonSplash game | W 26-14 | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs USC | W 42-27 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 42-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Iowa | W 18-16 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Wisconsin | W 21-7 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Rutgers | W 56-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Indiana | L 20-30 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Penn State | W 30-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Oregon State | W 41-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Northwestern | W 34-14 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oklahoma State | W 69-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Oregon | 7 | 15.9 | 5.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oregon | 7 | 15.9 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Oregon | 14 | 27.8 | 9.9 | 7 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oregon | 14 | 27.8 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Oregon | 30.5 | 39.2 | 16.7 | 16.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Oregon | 30.5 | 39.2 | 16.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 64.7 takeover score.
#2
Washington
4.5
Primary metric
Win with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 62.5 takeover score.
#3
Texas Tech
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59.1 takeover score.
#4
Washington
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#5
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Oregon
30.5 primary output · 39.2 efficiency · 16.7 usage
43.7
#2
2025 Regular Season · Oregon
43.7
30.5 primary · 39.2 efficiency · 16.7 usage
#3
2024 Postseason · Oregon
27.7
14 primary · 27.8 efficiency · 9.9 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8864
Sheldon · Eugene, OR
- Committed To
- Oregon
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
150
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.