Usage Score
19.2
Player Profile
Rueben Owens II
RB • 5'11" • 215 lbs • El Campo, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Rueben Owens II leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.5 efficiency.
Efficiency
57.5
Consistency
57.2
Season Value
58.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
232324242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas A&M
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Rueben Owens II, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Rueben Owens II leans balanced backfield option traits and 57.5 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 769 primary output with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 57.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
64.1
Efficiency
57.5
Usage
19.2
Consistency
57.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 28. UTSA: 38. Utah State: 51. Notre Dame: 29. Auburn: 52. Mississippi State: 161. Florida: 51. Arkansas: 96. LSU: 44. Missouri: 112. South Carolina: 52. Texas: 55
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 8 by 33.3. UTSA: 6 by 72.6. Utah State: 8 by 62.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 40.6. Auburn: 3 by 100. Mississippi State: 22 by 72.8. Florida: 17 by 31.3. Arkansas: 16 by 55.8. LSU: 8 by 57.3. Missouri: 15 by 80.1. South Carolina: 9 by 45.9. Texas: 16 by 37.4
Split Comparison
Wins68.6 · n=10 · +27.1 vs Losses
Losses41.5 · n=2 · -27.1 vs Wins
First Half59.8 · n=6 · -8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half68.3 · n=6 · +8.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 7 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 13 | 48 | 3.70 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 3.4 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 8 | 28 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 5.8 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 38-17 | 13 | 102 | 7.80 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 7.5 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | 8 | 44 | 5.50 | 0 | — | — | 5.5 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas2+ TD | W 45-42 | 14 | 69 | 4.90 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 6 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 17 | 51 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 31-9 | 21 | 142 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 3 | 52 | 17.30 | 0 | — | — | 17.3 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State | W 44-22 | 7 | 40 | 5.70 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6.4 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 5 | 37 | 7.40 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Texas A&M | 494 | 38.9 | 15.4 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 494 | 38.9 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 72 | 40.1 | 15.5 | -422 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 72 | 40.1 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 769 | 57.5 | 19.2 | 697 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 769 | 57.5 | 19.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
161
Primary metric
161 scrimmage yards and 34.4 usage.
#2
Unknown
124
Primary metric
Game with 124 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
124 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#3
Missouri
112
Primary metric
Win with 112 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
112 scrimmage yards and 25.4 usage.
#4
USC
62
Primary metric
Loss with 62 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
62 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#5
Arkansas
96
Primary metric
Win with 96 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
96 scrimmage yards and 27.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
769 primary output · 57.5 efficiency · 19.2 usage
58.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
58.5
769 primary · 57.5 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas A&M
44
494 primary · 38.9 efficiency · 15.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9853
El Campo · El Campo, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,335
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.