Usage Score
14.8
Player Dossier
2023-2025Notre Dame
Jaden Greathouse
WR • 6'1" • 212 lbs • Austin, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jaden Greathouse reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78
Consistency
35.8
Season Value
57.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Notre Dame
2323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaden Greathouse, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Notre Dame. Jaden Greathouse reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 592 primary output with 78 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
16
Receiving Yards / G
37
Efficiency
78
Usage
14.8
Consistency
35.8
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213141516
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio State: 128. Penn State: 105. Georgia: 6. Indiana: 8. Texas A&M: 26. Northern Illinois: 41. Purdue: 0. Miami (OH): 12. Louisville: 61. Stanford: 19. Georgia Tech: 43. Navy: 42. Florida State: 66. Virginia: 17. Army: 12. USC: 6
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio State: 6 by 100. Penn State: 7 by 100. Georgia: 2 by 20. Indiana: 1 by 53.3. Texas A&M: 3 by 57.8. Northern Illinois: 5 by 54.7. Miami (OH): 1 by 80. Louisville: 4 by 100. Stanford: 1 by 100. Georgia Tech: 3 by 95.6. Navy: 1 by 100. Florida State: 5 by 88. Virginia: 1 by 100. Army: 1 by 80. USC: 1 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins30.2 · n=14 · -54.3 vs Losses
Losses84.5 · n=2 · +54.3 vs Wins
First Half40.8 · n=8 · +7.5 vs Second Half
Second Half33.3 · n=8 · -7.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/21 | vs Ohio State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 23-34 | — | 6 | 128 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 2 | 34 |
| Fri 1/10 | @ Penn State100 receiving yards | W 27-24 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 54 |
| Thu 1/2 | @ Georgia | W 23-10 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 12/21 | vs Indiana | W 27-17 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/30 | @ USC | W 49-35 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Army | W 49-14 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Virginia | W 35-14 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Florida State | W 52-3 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Navy | W 51-14 | — | 1 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Georgia Tech | W 31-13 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Stanford | W 49-7 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Louisville | W 31-24 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Miami (OH) | W 28-3 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Purdue | W 66-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Northern Illinois | L 14-16 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Texas A&M | W 23-13 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | Notre Dame | 265 | 77.5 | 13.2 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 265 | 77.5 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Notre Dame | 592 | 78 | 14.8 | 327 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 592 | 78 | 14.8 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 73 | 100 | 9.2 | -519 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Penn State
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Wake Forest
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
41
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Notre Dame
592 primary output · 78 efficiency · 14.8 usage
57.1
#2
2024 Regular Season · Notre Dame
57.1
592 primary · 78 efficiency · 14.8 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Notre Dame
56.5
73 primary · 100 efficiency · 9.2 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.9407
Westlake · Austin, TX
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
930
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.