Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2023-2025Indiana
Amare Ferrell
DB • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Lake City, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Amare Ferrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Efficiency
20
Consistency
38.9
Season Value
22.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Indiana
2324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Indiana
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Amare Ferrell, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Indiana. Amare Ferrell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Indiana paired 0 primary output with 16.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Indiana
Games
16
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
20
Usage
4.7
Consistency
38.9
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213141516
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. Oregon: 0. Alabama: 0. Old Dominion: 2. Kennesaw State: 1. Unknown: 1. Illinois: 2. Iowa: 1. Oregon: 0. Michigan State: 2. UCLA: 0. Maryland: 0. Penn State: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Purdue: 2. Ohio State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 1 by 4.2. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Old Dominion: 2 by 28.3. Kennesaw State: 1 by 14.2. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Illinois: 3 by 32.5. Iowa: 5 by 30.8. Oregon: 7 by 29.2. Michigan State: 3 by 32.5. UCLA: 3 by 12.5. Maryland: 2 by 8.3. Penn State: 3 by 22.5. Wisconsin: 2 by 8.3. Purdue: 4 by 36.7. Ohio State: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.7 · n=15
First Half0.9 · n=8 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · n=8 · -0.3 vs First Half
All Games0.8 · n=16
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
36.7 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/20 | vs Miami | W 27-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 1/10 | vs Oregon | W 56-22 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 1/1 | vs Alabama | W 38-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Ohio State | W 13-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ PurdueSplash game | W 56-3 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Wisconsin | W 31-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Maryland | W 55-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UCLA | W 56-6 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Michigan State | W 38-13 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oregon | W 30-20 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa | W 20-15 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Illinois | W 63-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kennesaw State | W 56-9 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Old Dominion | W 27-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Indiana
2023-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Regular Season | Indiana | 0 | 16.7 | 3.3 | — |
| 2024 Postseason | Indiana | 10.5 | 23.8 | 7.3 | 10.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Indiana | 10.5 | 23.8 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Indiana | 12 | 20 | 4.7 | 1.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Indiana | 12 | 20 | 4.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 63.6 takeover score.
#2
Notre Dame
2.5
Primary metric
Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 50.9 takeover score.
#3
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.6 takeover score.
#4
Old Dominion
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.8 takeover score.
#5
Illinois
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Indiana
0 primary output · 16.7 efficiency · 3.3 usage
40
#2
2025 Postseason · Indiana
22.7
12 primary · 20 efficiency · 4.7 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Indiana
22.7
12 primary · 20 efficiency · 4.7 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8817
Columbia · Lake City, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
105
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.