Usage Score
25.4
Player Profile
KC Concepcion
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
KC Concepcion reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.8
Consistency
67.2
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
2323242525
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- NC State
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
KC Concepcion, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. KC Concepcion reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 919 primary output with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.7
Efficiency
85.8
Usage
25.4
Consistency
67.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 33. UTSA: 72. Utah State: 73. Notre Dame: 82. Auburn: 113. Mississippi State: 61. Florida: 46. Arkansas: 53. LSU: 45. Missouri: 84. South Carolina: 158. Unknown: 42. Texas: 57
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 4 by 55. UTSA: 3 by 100. Utah State: 6 by 81.1. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 100. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Florida: 4 by 76.7. Arkansas: 5 by 70.7. LSU: 3 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 100. South Carolina: 7 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 56. Texas: 5 by 76
Split Comparison
Wins78.7 · n=10 · +33.7 vs Losses
Losses45 · n=2 · -33.7 vs Wins
First Half68.6 · n=7 · -4.6 vs Second Half
Second Half73.2 · n=6 · +4.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 4 | 33 | 7.5 | 8.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 5 | 57 | 10.8 | 11.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards | W 31-30 | — | 7 | 158 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 84 | 15.3 | 21 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 5 | 53 | 11.5 | 10.60 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | — | 4 | 46 | 9.2 | 11.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State2+ TD | W 31-9 | — | 4 | 61 | 13.8 | 15.30 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards | W 16-10 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State2+ TD | W 44-22 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
NC State
2023-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | NC State | 839 | 69.6 | 32.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | NC State | 839 | 69.6 | 32.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | NC State | 459 | 58.9 | 24.3 | -380 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 919 | 85.8 | 25.4 | 460 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 919 | 85.8 | 25.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
158
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
121
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 89.6 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
919 primary output · 85.8 efficiency · 25.4 usage
65.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
65.6
919 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 25.4 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · NC State
62.4
839 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 32.8 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8825
Chambers · Charlotte, NC
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2023
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,217
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.