Usage Score
25.4
Player Dossier
2023-2025Texas A&M
WR • 5'11" • 190 lbs • Charlotte, NC, USA
Kevin Concepcion reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.4
Efficiency
85.8
Consistency
67.2
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kevin Concepcion, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Kevin Concepcion reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Kevin Concepcion played WR for NC State and Texas A&M. Across 3 tracked seasons, Kevin Concepcion recorded 45 passing yards, 431 rushing yards, and 2,217 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2023 with NC State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 919 primary output with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across NC State, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
70.7
Efficiency
85.8
Usage
25.4
Consistency
67.2
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 33. UTSA: 72. Utah State: 73. Notre Dame: 82. Auburn: 113. Mississippi State: 61. Florida: 46. Arkansas: 53. LSU: 45. Missouri: 84. South Carolina: 158. Unknown: 42. Texas: 57
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 4 by 55. UTSA: 3 by 100. Utah State: 6 by 81.1. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. Auburn: 7 by 100. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Florida: 4 by 76.7. Arkansas: 5 by 70.7. LSU: 3 by 100. Missouri: 4 by 100. South Carolina: 7 by 100. Unknown: 5 by 56. Texas: 5 by 76
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | — | 4 | 33 | 7.5 | 8.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | — | 5 | 57 | 10.8 | 11.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards | W 31-30 | — | 7 | 158 | 22.6 | 22.60 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | — | 4 | 84 | 15.3 | 21 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU | W 49-25 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | — | 5 | 53 | 11.5 | 10.60 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | — | 4 | 46 | 9.2 | 11.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State2+ TD | W 31-9 | — | 4 | 61 | 13.8 | 15.30 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn100 receiving yards | W 16-10 | — | 7 | 113 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | — | 4 | 82 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State2+ TD | W 44-22 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 2 | 15 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 31 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
NC State
2023-2024
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Postseason | NC State | 839 | 69.6 | 32.8 | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | NC State | 839 | 69.6 | 32.8 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | NC State | 459 | 58.9 | 24.3 | -380 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 919 | 85.8 | 25.4 | 460 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 919 | 85.8 | 25.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131
Primary metric
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
South Carolina
158
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
121
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
121 receiving yards with a 89.6 efficiency score.
#5
Auburn
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
919 primary output · 85.8 efficiency · 25.4 usage
65.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
65.6
919 primary · 85.8 efficiency · 25.4 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · NC State
62.4
839 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 32.8 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2023 · Rating 0.8825
Chambers · Charlotte, NC
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,217
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.