Usage Score
10.2
Player Dossier
2022-2025Rutgers
Dane Pardridge
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Dekalb, IL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Dane Pardridge reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.5
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
54.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
222323242425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Northern Illinois • Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dane Pardridge, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season · Northern Illinois. Dane Pardridge reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Regular Season
Northern Illinois paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 72.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Northern Illinois, Rutgers.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Northern Illinois
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
20.1
Efficiency
72.5
Usage
10.2
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas State: 15. Nebraska: 18. Akron: 2. Eastern Michigan: 14. Central Michigan: 6. Ball State: 40. Western Michigan: 22. Kent State: 44
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Nebraska: 2 by 60. Akron: 1 by 13.3. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 93.3. Central Michigan: 1 by 40. Ball State: 2 by 100. Western Michigan: 2 by 73.3. Kent State: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins19.4 · Games = 5 · -1.9 vs Losses
Losses21.3 · Games = 3 · +1.9 vs Wins
First Half12.3 · Games = 4 · -15.8 vs Second Half
Second Half28 · Games = 4 · +15.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/23 | vs Arkansas State | W 21-19 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Kent State | W 37-27 | — | 1 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 0 | 44 |
| Wed 11/15 | vs Western Michigan | W 24-0 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 16 |
| Wed 11/8 | vs Ball State | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 40 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Tue 10/31 | @ Central Michigan | L 31-37 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Akron | W 55-14 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Nebraska | L 11-35 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northern Illinois
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
Rutgers
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232023202420242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 161 | 72.5 | 10.2 | 161 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 161 | 72.5 | 10.2 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Northern Illinois | 238 | 64 | 10.9 | 77 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Northern Illinois | 238 | 64 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | -238 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Fresno State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59
Primary metric
59 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2022 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2024 Postseason · Northern Illinois
57
238 primary · 64 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Northern Illinois
57
238 primary · 64 efficiency · 10.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7844
Marmion Academy · Summit Argo, IL
- Committed To
- Northern Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
399
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.