Usage Score
16.7
Player Dossier
2012-2013UTSA
Evans Okotcha
RB • 5'9" • Coppell, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Evans Okotcha leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
41.7
Consistency
35.3
Season Value
39.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
1213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- UTSA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Evans Okotcha, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA. Evans Okotcha leans balanced backfield option traits and 41.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTSA paired 799 primary output with 52.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 41.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
48.5
Efficiency
41.7
Usage
16.7
Consistency
35.3
Best Game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 37. Oklahoma State: 36. Arizona: 22. UTEP: 49. Houston: 36. Marshall: 24. Rice: 12. UAB: 34. Tulsa: 7. North Texas: 104. Louisiana Tech: 173
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 8 by 37. Oklahoma State: 13 by 31.4. Arizona: 3 by 36.8. UTEP: 8 by 56.8. Houston: 6 by 58.8. Marshall: 9 by 26. Rice: 4 by 31.3. UAB: 7 by 50.6. Tulsa: 4 by 11.5. North Texas: 16 by 67.7. Louisiana Tech: 28 by 51
Split Comparison
Wins67.3 · n=6 · +41.3 vs Losses
Losses26 · n=5 · -41.3 vs Wins
First Half34 · n=6 · -32 vs Second Half
Second Half66 · n=5 · +32 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
67.7 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Louisiana Tech100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-10 | 26 | 105 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 68 | 6.2 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ North Texas100 rush yards | W 21-13 | 16 | 104 | 6.50 | 0 | — | — | 6.5 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Tulsa | W 34-15 | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1.8 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs UAB | W 52-31 | 7 | 34 | 4.90 | 1 | — | — | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Rice | L 21-27 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Marshall | L 10-34 | 8 | 19 | 2.40 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2.7 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Houston | L 28-59 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 6 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ UTEP | W 32-13 | 6 | 30 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 6.1 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Arizona | L 13-38 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 21 | 7.3 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Oklahoma State | L 35-56 | 11 | 35 | 3.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2.8 |
| Sun 9/1 | @ New Mexico | W 21-13 | 6 | 17 | 2.80 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 4.6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTSA
2012-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 799 | 52.6 | 20.1 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 534 | 41.7 | 16.7 | -265 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas State
Win with 114 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
114
Primary metric
114 scrimmage yards and 21.8 usage.
#2
Louisiana Tech
173
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
173 scrimmage yards and 43.8 usage.
#3
Oregon State
21
Primary metric
Game with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and — usage.
#4
San José State
105
Primary metric
Loss with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
105 scrimmage yards and 16.1 usage.
#5
Unknown
87
Primary metric
Game with 87 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
87 scrimmage yards and 23.6 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
799 primary output · 52.6 efficiency · 20.1 usage
59.5
#2
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
39.9
534 primary · 41.7 efficiency · 16.7 usage
Milestones
5
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,333
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.