Usage / Role
17%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2013Tulsa
WR • 6'2" • Norco, LA, USA
Jordan James reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
17%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
44
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
42
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
53
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Tulsa
Snapshot
Player Story
Jordan James built his college career from 2009 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Norco, LA wearing No. 12, spending time with Tulsa. The clearest part of Jordan James' career was his receiving role: 112 catches,...
Read the storyJordan James, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Tulsa. Jordan James reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 54.2 |
| 2011 Postseason | Tulsa | 11 | 4 | 36 | 0 | 56.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 11 | 27 | 355 | 1 | 56.4 |
| 2012 Postseason | Tulsa | 14 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 68 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 14 | 40 | 565 | 2 | 68 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 11 | 39 | 471 | 2 | 70.4 |
Related Context
Jordan James played WR for Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jordan James recorded 1,457 receiving yards and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 471 primary output with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
42.8
Efficiency
74.1
Usage
19.8
Consistency
58.7
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Bowling Green: 58. Colorado State: 40. Oklahoma: 100. Iowa State: 86. Rice: 12. Tulane: 27. UTSA: 50. East Carolina: 17. Marshall: 37. Louisiana Tech: 34. North Texas: 10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Colorado State: 3 by 88.9. Oklahoma: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 8 by 71.7. Rice: 1 by 80. Tulane: 3 by 60. UTSA: 5 by 66.7. East Carolina: 2 by 56.7. Marshall: 3 by 82.2. Louisiana Tech: 3 by 75.6. North Texas: 2 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs North Texas | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 24-14 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Fri 11/15 | vs Marshall | L 34-45 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ East Carolina | L 24-58 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTSA | L 15-34 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Tulane | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 27 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Rice | L 27-30 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 9/26 | vs Iowa StateHigh volume | L 21-38 | — | 8 | 86 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Oklahoma100 receiving yards | L 20-51 | — | 6 | 100 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Colorado State | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Thu 8/29 | @ Bowling Green | L 7-34 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 37 |
Player Story
Jordan James built his college career from 2009 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Norco, LA wearing No. 12, spending time with Tulsa. The clearest part of Jordan James' career was his receiving role: 112 catches, 1,457 receiving yards, and 5 touchdowns across 37 career games in the available record. That gives Jordan James' career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulsa | 27 | 100 | 3.6 | 27 |
| 2011 Postseason | Tulsa | 391 | 60.7 | 14.7 | 364 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulsa | 391 | 60.7 | 14.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Tulsa | 568 | 72.5 | 16.1 | 177 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulsa | 568 | 72.5 | 16.1 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Tulsa | 471 | 74.1 | 19.8 | -97 |
#1 Featured game
@ Oklahoma
Week 3 · L 20-51
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ SMU
Week 13 · L 27-35 · Conference game
145
Receiving Yards
94.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ UCF
Week 10 · W 24-17 · Conference game
74
Receiving Yards
89.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#4
vs Iowa State
Week 5 · L 21-38
86
Receiving Yards
85.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
#5
vs Fresno State
Week 4 · W 27-26
84
Receiving Yards
84.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Tulsa
471 primary output · 74.1 efficiency · 19.8 usage
70.4
#2
2012 Postseason · Tulsa
68
568 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Tulsa
68
568 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 16.1 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.