Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2009-2011Marshall
Troy Evans
WR • 5'9" • Oakland, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Troy Evans reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.6
Consistency
33
Season Value
54.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Marshall
09101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Marshall
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Troy Evans, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Marshall. Troy Evans reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Marshall paired 337 primary output with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Marshall
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
33.7
Efficiency
69.6
Usage
17
Consistency
33
Best Game by takeover score
Florida International
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 23. Ohio: 37. Virginia Tech: 0. UCF: 12. Rice: 22. Houston: 86. UAB: 106. Tulsa: 6. Memphis: 23. East Carolina: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 6 by 25.6. Ohio: 2 by 100. UCF: 1 by 80. Rice: 4 by 36.7. Houston: 6 by 95.6. UAB: 6 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 40. Memphis: 1 by 100. East Carolina: 3 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Wins39.2 · n=5 · +11.0 vs Losses
Losses28.2 · n=5 · -11.0 vs Wins
First Half18.8 · n=5 · -29.8 vs Second Half
Second Half48.6 · n=5 · +29.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/21 | vs Florida International | W 20-10 | — | 6 | 23 | 3.8 | 3.80 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs East Carolina | W 34-27 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/18 | @ Memphis | W 23-22 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Tulsa | L 17-59 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs UAB100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 59-14 | — | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Houston | L 28-63 | — | 6 | 86 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Rice | W 24-20 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UCF | L 6-16 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Virginia Tech | L 10-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ohio | L 7-44 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 0 | 33 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Marshall
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Marshall | 17 | 45.6 | 14 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Marshall | 225 | 55.7 | 11.5 | 208 |
| 2011 Postseason | Marshall | 337 | 69.6 | 17 | 112 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Marshall | 337 | 69.6 | 17 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Houston
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 95.6 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Marshall
337 primary output · 69.6 efficiency · 17 usage
54.9
#2
2011 Regular Season · Marshall
54.9
337 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 17 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Marshall
40.4
225 primary · 55.7 efficiency · 11.5 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
579
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.