Usage Score
14.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025California
QB • 6'5" • 225 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Fernando Mendoza is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
14.3
Efficiency
71
Consistency
88.5
Season Value
68.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Indiana
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Fernando Mendoza, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Indiana. Fernando Mendoza is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Indiana paired 3,811 primary output with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 71 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across California, Indiana.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 350 yards of offense and 80.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
16
Primary Metric / G
238.2
Efficiency
71
Usage
14.3
Consistency
88.5
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 178. Oregon: 205. Alabama: 208. Old Dominion: 226. Kennesaw State: 265. Unknown: 289. Illinois: 271. Iowa: 259. Oregon: 246. Michigan State: 350. UCLA: 213. Maryland: 225. Penn State: 238. Wisconsin: 275. Purdue: 144. Ohio State: 219
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 34 by 54.2. Oregon: 26 by 76.4. Alabama: 24 by 76.9. Old Dominion: 37 by 66.2. Kennesaw State: 28 by 80.1. Unknown: 26 by 81.7. Illinois: 30 by 73.4. Iowa: 31 by 64. Oregon: 37 by 65.3. Michigan State: 33 by 80.1. UCLA: 27 by 75.9. Maryland: 25 by 71.8. Penn State: 36 by 61. Wisconsin: 30 by 72.9. Purdue: 17 by 79.6. Ohio State: 28 by 57.1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
81.7 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/20 | vs Miami | W 27-21 | 16 | 27 | 186 | 59.3 | 0 | 0 | 54.2 | 7 | -8 | -1.10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 1/10 | vs Oregon3+ TD | W 56-22 | 17 | 20 | 177 | 85.0 | 5 | 0 | 76.4 | 6 | 28 | 4.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Thu 1/1 | vs Alabama3+ TD | W 38-3 | 14 | 16 | 192 | 87.5 | 3 | 0 | 76.9 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 12/7 | @ Ohio State | W 13-10 | 15 | 23 | 222 | 65.2 | 1 | 1 | 57.1 | 5 | -3 | -0.60 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Purdue3+ TD | W 56-3 | 8 | 15 | 117 | 53.3 | 2 | 0 | 79.6 | 2 | 27 | 13.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Wisconsin3+ TD | W 31-7 | 22 | 24 | 299 | 91.7 | 4 | 0 | 72.9 | 6 | -24 | -4 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Penn State | W 27-24 | 19 | 30 | 218 | 63.3 | 1 | 1 | 61 | 6 | 20 | 3.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Maryland | W 55-10 | 14 | 21 | 201 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 71.8 | 4 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UCLA3+ TD | W 56-6 | 15 | 22 | 168 | 68.2 | 3 | 1 | 75.9 | 5 | 45 | 9 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Michigan State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-13 | 24 | 28 | 332 | 85.7 | 4 | 0 | 80.1 | 5 | 18 | 3.60 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Oregon | W 30-20 | 20 | 31 | 215 | 64.5 | 1 | 1 | 65.3 | 6 | 31 | 5.20 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa | W 20-15 | 13 | 23 | 233 | 56.5 | 2 | 1 | 64 | 8 | 26 | 3.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Illinois3+ TD | W 63-10 | 21 | 23 | 267 | 91.3 | 5 | 0 | 73.4 | 7 | 4 | 0.60 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 9/12 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 19 | 20 | 270 | 95.0 | 5 | 0 | 81.7 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kennesaw State3+ TD | W 56-9 | 18 | 25 | 245 | 72.0 | 4 | 0 | 80.1 | 3 | 20 | 6.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Old Dominion | W 27-14 | 18 | 31 | 193 | 58.1 | 0 | 0 | 66.2 | 6 | 33 | 5.50 | 1 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
California
2022-2024
Opening stop
Indiana
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | California | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | California | 1,794 | 53.8 | 16.1 | 1,794 |
| 2023 Regular Season | California | 1,794 | 53.8 | 16.1 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | California | 3,109 | 61.3 | 24.6 | 1,315 |
| 2025 Postseason | Indiana | 3,811 | 71 | 14.3 | 702 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Indiana | 3,811 | 71 | 14.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
436
Primary metric
436 total offense with 68.1 efficiency.
#2
Michigan State
350
Primary metric
Win with 350 yards of offense and 80.1 efficiency.
350 total offense with 80.1 efficiency.
#3
USC
340
Primary metric
Loss with 340 yards of offense and 69.1 efficiency.
340 total offense with 69.1 efficiency.
#4
Stanford
334
Primary metric
Win with 334 yards of offense and 67.6 efficiency.
334 total offense with 67.6 efficiency.
#5
Oregon State
389
Primary metric
Win with 389 yards of offense and 77.3 efficiency.
389 total offense with 77.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Indiana
3,811 primary output · 71 efficiency · 14.3 usage
68.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Indiana
68.5
3,811 primary · 71 efficiency · 14.3 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · California
65.5
3,109 primary · 61.3 efficiency · 24.6 usage
15
250+ passing yards
7
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
21
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.7933
Columbus · Miami, FL
Career Facts
2
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
8,714
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Fernando Mendoza quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit