Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2009-2013UTEP
Craig Wenrick
TE • 6'5" • Flower Mound, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Craig Wenrick reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90.7
Consistency
71.1
Season Value
68.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP
0910111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Craig Wenrick, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · UTEP. Craig Wenrick reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTEP paired 180 primary output with 90.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 90.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
36
Efficiency
90.7
Usage
12.1
Consistency
71.1
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 26. Colorado State: 32. Louisiana Tech: 52. North Texas: 20. Middle Tennessee: 50
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 2 by 86.7. Colorado State: 2 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 66.7. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Losses36 · n=5
First Half36.7 · n=3 · +1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half35 · n=2 · -1.7 vs First Half
All Games36 · n=5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisiana Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Middle Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | UTEP | 105 | 66.7 | 7.5 | 105 |
| 2012 Regular Season | UTEP | 150 | 71.4 | 11.9 | 45 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTEP | 180 | 90.7 | 12.1 | 30 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Primary metric
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Louisiana Tech
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ole Miss
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · UTEP
180 primary output · 90.7 efficiency · 12.1 usage
68.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · UTEP
54.1
150 primary · 71.4 efficiency · 11.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · UTEP
43.2
105 primary · 66.7 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
435
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.