Usage Score
19.4
Player Dossier
2009-2010UTEP
Marlon McClure
WR • 5'9" • Tenaha, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Marlon McClure reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.3
Consistency
71
Season Value
65
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UTEP
091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marlon McClure, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · UTEP. Marlon McClure reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UTEP paired 343 primary output with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · UTEP
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
31.2
Efficiency
70.3
Usage
19.4
Consistency
71
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 38. Houston: 48. New Mexico State: 17. Memphis: 48. New Mexico: 2. UAB: 25. Tulane: 32. Marshall: 48. SMU: 60. Arkansas: 0. Tulsa: 25
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 4 by 63.3. Houston: 2 by 100. New Mexico State: 2 by 56.7. Memphis: 4 by 80. New Mexico: 1 by 13.3. UAB: 1 by 100. Tulane: 4 by 53.3. Marshall: 6 by 53.3. SMU: 4 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 83.3
Split Comparison
Wins31.8 · n=4 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses30.9 · n=7 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half29.7 · n=6 · -3.3 vs Second Half
Second Half33 · n=5 · +3.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU | L 24-52 | — | 4 | 38 | 7 | 9.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas | L 21-58 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | — | 4 | 60 | 12.2 | 15 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | — | 4 | 32 | 8.5 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico | W 38-20 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State | W 42-10 | — | 2 | 17 | 5.3 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston | L 24-54 | — | 2 | 48 | 16.7 | 24 | 0 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 43 | 48.9 | 9.9 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 343 | 70.3 | 19.4 | 300 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 343 | 70.3 | 19.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60
Primary metric
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
48
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Houston
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
48
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 53.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · UTEP
343 primary output · 70.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
65
#2
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
65
343 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 19.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
20.6
43 primary · 48.9 efficiency · 9.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
386
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.