Usage Score
7.3
Player Dossier
2022-2025Texas Tech
Ben Roberts
LB • 6'3" • 235 lbs • Haslet, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Ben Roberts shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34 disruption score.
Efficiency
34
Consistency
52.4
Season Value
26.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
22232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ben Roberts, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas Tech. Ben Roberts shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 13 primary output with 34 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
34
Usage
7.3
Consistency
52.4
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oregon: 2. Unknown: 0. Kent State: 0. Oregon State: 2. Utah: 1. Houston: 0. Kansas: 1. Arizona State: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas State: 2. BYU: 0. UCF: 1. West Virginia: 0. BYU: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oregon: 16 by 70. Unknown: 4 by 16.7. Kent State: 6 by 25. Oregon State: 3 by 32.5. Utah: 6 by 35. Houston: 6 by 25. Kansas: 6 by 35. Arizona State: 13 by 60. Oklahoma State: 5 by 20.8. Kansas State: 3 by 32.5. BYU: 6 by 25. UCF: 5 by 30.8. West Virginia: 4 by 16.7. BYU: 5 by 50.8
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=11 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · n=2 · +0.6 vs Wins
First Half0.9 · n=7 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=7 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
70 vs Oregon
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | vs Oregon10+ tackles · Splash game | L 0-23 | 16 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/6 | vs BYUSplash game | W 34-7 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ West Virginia | W 49-0 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs UCF | W 48-9 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs BYU | W 29-7 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Kansas StateSplash game | W 43-20 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Oklahoma State | W 42-0 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arizona State10+ tackles | L 22-26 | 13 | 9 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas | W 42-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Houston | W 35-11 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Utah | W 34-10 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oregon State | W 45-14 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Kent State | W 62-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Postseason | Texas Tech | 9 | 40.3 | 11 | 9 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 9 | 40.3 | 11 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas Tech | 4.5 | 31.2 | 8 | -4.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 4.5 | 31.2 | 8 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas Tech | 13 | 34 | 7.3 | 8.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 13 | 34 | 7.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 71.1 takeover score.
#2
Cincinnati
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 64 takeover score.
#3
BYU
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.9 takeover score.
#4
Oregon
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.8 takeover score.
#5
West Virginia
1.5
Primary metric
Loss with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 44.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas Tech
13 primary output · 34 efficiency · 7.3 usage
26.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas Tech
26.6
13 primary · 34 efficiency · 7.3 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Texas Tech
17.6
9 primary · 40.3 efficiency · 11 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
6
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8541
Eaton · Haslet, TX
- Committed To
- Texas Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
272
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.