Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2013Troy
WR • 6'0" • Montgomery, AL, USA
Wilson Van Hooser reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
16%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
42
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
36
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
58
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Player Story
Wilson Van Hooser built his college career from 2009 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Montgomery, AL wearing No. 9, spending time with Troy and Tulane. The clearest part of Wilson Van Hooser's career was his...
Read the storyWilson Van Hooser, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Tulane. Wilson Van Hooser reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 8 | 8 | 85 | 0 | 37.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 13 | 36 | 487 | 4 | 69.1 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulane | 6 | 11 | 233 | 5 | 54.9 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Troy | 10 | 13 | 188 | 2 | 43 |
Related Context
Wilson Van Hooser played WR for Tulane and Troy. Across 5 tracked seasons, Wilson Van Hooser recorded 3 rushing yards, 993 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Tulane.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Tulane paired 487 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2013 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulane, Troy.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
37.5
Efficiency
78.2
Usage
14.5
Consistency
49.8
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SE Louisiana: 64. Tulsa: 12. UAB: 33. Duke: 23. Army: 10. Syracuse: 0. UTEP: 47. Memphis: 100. East Carolina: 28. SMU: 66. Houston: 23. Rice: 56. Hawai'i: 25
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SE Louisiana: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 80. UAB: 2 by 100. Duke: 1 by 100. Army: 1 by 66.7. Syracuse: 2 by 0. UTEP: 3 by 100. Memphis: 6 by 100. East Carolina: 4 by 46.7. SMU: 5 by 88. Houston: 2 by 76.7. Rice: 5 by 74.7. Hawai'i: 2 by 83.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ Hawai'i | L 23-35 | — | 2 | 25 | 8 | 12.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Rice | L 7-19 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 17 |
| Fri 11/11 | vs Houston | L 17-73 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ SMU | L 24-45 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ East Carolina | L 13-34 | — | 4 | 28 | 4.4 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis100 receiving yards | L 17-33 | — | 6 | 100 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs UTEP | L 7-44 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Syracuse | L 34-37 | — | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Army | L 6-45 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Duke | L 27-48 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UAB | W 49-10 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Tulsa | L 3-31 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs SE Louisiana | W 47-33 | — | 2 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 1 | 55 |
Player Story
Wilson Van Hooser built his college career from 2009 through 2013 as a wide receiver from Montgomery, AL wearing No. 9, spending time with Troy and Tulane. The clearest part of Wilson Van Hooser's career was his receiving role: 68 catches, 993 receiving yards, 11 touchdowns, and 3 rushing yards across 37 career games in the available record. His career also includes 3 rushing yards and 354 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Wilson Van Hooser's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2009-2012
Opening stop
Troy
2013
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulane | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tulane | 85 | 66.7 | 4.8 | 85 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Tulane | 487 | 78.2 | 14.5 | 402 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Tulane | 233 | 86.7 | 6.1 | -254 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Troy | 188 | 70 | 5.8 | -45 |
#1 Featured game
vs Memphis
Week 8 · L 17-33 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100
Receiving Yards
88.2 takeover
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ SMU
Week 10 · L 24-45 · Conference game
66
Receiving Yards
79.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
#3
vs UL Monroe
Week 10 · L 37-49 · Conference game
61
Receiving Yards
77.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Rice
Week 10 · L 47-49 · Conference game
68
Receiving Yards
74.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Marshall
Week 13 · L 23-38 · Conference game
30
Receiving Yards
72.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Tulane
487 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 14.5 usage
69.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Tulane
54.9
233 primary · 86.7 efficiency · 6.1 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Troy
43
188 primary · 70 efficiency · 5.8 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.