Usage Score
30.1
Player Profile
Trent Steelman
QB • 6'0" • Bowling Green, KY, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Trent Steelman is a dual-threat creator with 30.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
62.9
Consistency
82.8
Season Value
68.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Army
0910101112
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Army
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Army
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Trent Steelman, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Army. Trent Steelman is a dual-threat creator with 30.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Army paired 1,915 primary output with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 62.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Army
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
159.6
Efficiency
62.9
Usage
30.1
Consistency
82.8
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 53. Northern Illinois: 124. Wake Forest: 159. Unknown: 146. Boston College: 220. Kent State: 132. Eastern Michigan: 231. Ball State: 139. Air Force: 201. Rutgers: 157. Temple: 209. Navy: 144
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 17 by 23.2. Northern Illinois: 30 by 49.6. Wake Forest: 26 by 78.1. Unknown: 26 by 62.4. Boston College: 34 by 65.2. Kent State: 28 by 62.9. Eastern Michigan: 21 by 62.9. Ball State: 22 by 70.7. Air Force: 35 by 75.4. Rutgers: 43 by 51.8. Temple: 27 by 73.9. Navy: 22 by 79.1
Split Comparison
Wins210.5 · n=2 · +60.7 vs Losses
Losses149.8 · n=9 · -60.7 vs Wins
First Half139 · n=6 · -41.2 vs Second Half
Second Half180.2 · n=6 · +41.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
79.1 vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/8 | vs NavyDual-threat | L 13-17 | 4 | 5 | 48 | 80.0 | 0 | 0 | 79.1 | 17 | 96 | 5.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Temple3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 32-63 | 3 | 7 | 70 | 42.9 | 0 | 0 | 73.9 | 20 | 139 | 6.90 | 3 | 56 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ RutgersDual-threat | L 7-28 | 7 | 17 | 55 | 41.2 | 0 | 0 | 51.8 | 26 | 102 | 3.90 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Air ForceDual-threat | W 41-21 | 4 | 6 | 100 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | 75.4 | 29 | 101 | 3.50 | 2 | 11 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Ball StateDual-threat | L 22-30 | 3 | 5 | 38 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | 70.7 | 17 | 101 | 5.90 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Eastern MichiganDual-threat | L 38-48 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 62.9 | 16 | 212 | 13.30 | 2 | 75 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Kent StateDual-threat | L 17-31 | 5 | 9 | 66 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | 62.9 | 19 | 66 | 3.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Boston College3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 34-31 | 5 | 12 | 79 | 41.7 | 0 | 0 | 65.2 | 22 | 141 | 6.40 | 3 | 29 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UnknownDual-threat | — | 4 | 9 | 57 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | 62.4 | 17 | 89 | 5.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Wake Forest3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 37-49 | 3 | 4 | 77 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 78.1 | 22 | 82 | 3.70 | 3 | 16 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Northern IllinoisDual-threat | L 40-41 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 49.6 | 27 | 116 | 4.30 | 2 | 25 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ San Diego State | L 7-42 | 3 | 8 | 50 | 37.5 | 0 | 2 | 23.2 | 9 | 3 | 0.30 | 0 | 3 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Army | 1,343 | 55.8 | 34.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Army | 1,716 | 60.3 | 27.5 | 373 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 1,716 | 60.3 | 27.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Army | 1,069 | 59.4 | 23 | -647 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Army | 1,915 | 62.9 | 30.1 | 846 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
223
Primary metric
223 total offense with 85.3 efficiency.
#2
North Texas
219
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
219 total offense with 63.1 efficiency.
#3
Rutgers
217
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
217 total offense with 65.8 efficiency.
#4
Air Force
201
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
201 total offense with 75.4 efficiency.
#5
Temple
209
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
209 total offense with 73.9 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Army
1,915 primary output · 62.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
68.7
#2
2010 Postseason · Army
62.3
1,716 primary · 60.3 efficiency · 27.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Army
62.3
1,716 primary · 60.3 efficiency · 27.5 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
3
3+ takeover TD games
25
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
6,043
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.