Usage Score
30.2
Player Dossier
2009-2010Army
George Jordan
WR • 6'3" • Marlborough, MA, USA
Alpha targetPossession profile
George Jordan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64
Consistency
42.4
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Army
0910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Army
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
George Jordan, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Army. George Jordan reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Army paired 148 primary output with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Army
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
18.5
Efficiency
64
Usage
30.2
Consistency
42.4
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Eastern Michigan: 34. North Texas: 9. Temple: 11. Rutgers: 8. Air Force: 7. Kent State: 46. Notre Dame: 12. Navy: 21
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 75.6. North Texas: 1 by 60. Temple: 1 by 73.3. Rutgers: 1 by 53.3. Air Force: 1 by 46.7. Kent State: 4 by 76.7. Notre Dame: 1 by 80. Navy: 3 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins29.7 · n=3 · +17.9 vs Losses
Losses11.8 · n=5 · -17.9 vs Wins
First Half15.5 · n=4 · -6 vs Second Half
Second Half21.5 · n=4 · +6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
80 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/11 | vs Navy | L 17-31 | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Notre Dame | L 3-27 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Kent State | W 45-28 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Air Force | L 22-42 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Rutgers | L 20-23 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Temple | L 35-42 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs North Texas | W 24-0 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 31-27 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Army
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Army | 148 | 64 | 30.2 | 148 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46
Primary metric
46 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#3
Notre Dame
12
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Navy
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Army
148 primary output · 64 efficiency · 30.2 usage
59
#2
2009 Regular Season · Army
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
148
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 8 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.