Usage Score
44.8
Player Dossier
2009-2011Rutgers
Mohamed Sanu
WR • 6'2" • South Brunswick, NJ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Mohamed Sanu reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
71
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Rutgers
0909101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: West Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mohamed Sanu, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Rutgers. Mohamed Sanu reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Rutgers paired 1,206 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
92.8
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
44.8
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Iowa State: 62. Unknown: 68. North Carolina: 119. Ohio: 176. Syracuse: 65. Pittsburgh: 27. Navy: 100. Louisville: 128. West Virginia: 48. South Florida: 113. Army: 129. Cincinnati: 38. UConn: 133
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa State: 6 by 68.9. Unknown: 7 by 64.8. North Carolina: 13 by 61. Ohio: 16 by 73.3. Syracuse: 7 by 61.9. Pittsburgh: 2 by 90. Navy: 10 by 66.7. Louisville: 10 by 85.3. West Virginia: 5 by 64. South Florida: 11 by 68.5. Army: 13 by 66.2. Cincinnati: 6 by 42.2. UConn: 9 by 98.5
Split Comparison
Wins88.8 · n=8 · -18.3 vs Losses
Losses107 · n=4 · +18.3 vs Wins
First Half88.1 · n=7 · -10.0 vs Second Half
Second Half98.2 · n=6 · +10.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
98.5 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | @ Iowa State | W 27-13 | — | 6 | 62 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ UConn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 22-40 | — | 9 | 133 | 11.7 | 14.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Cincinnati | W 20-3 | — | 6 | 38 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Army100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-12 | — | 13 | 129 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs South Florida100 receiving yards · High volume | W 20-17 | — | 11 | 113 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs West Virginia | L 31-41 | — | 5 | 48 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Louisville100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-16 | — | 10 | 128 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 21-20 | — | 10 | 100 | 9.3 | 10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Pittsburgh | W 34-10 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Syracuse | W 19-16 | — | 7 | 65 | 8.5 | 9.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Ohio100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-26 | — | 16 | 176 | 11 | 11 | 2 | 32 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ North Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 22-24 | — | 13 | 119 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 1 | 18 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 68 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 1 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092009201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Rutgers | 639 | 69.9 | 30.1 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 639 | 69.9 | 30.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rutgers | 418 | 59.2 | 28.7 | -221 |
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 1,206 | 70.1 | 44.8 | 788 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1,206 | 70.1 | 44.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
West Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
176
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
176 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
70
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Rutgers
1,206 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 44.8 usage
71
#2
2011 Regular Season · Rutgers
71
1,206 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 44.8 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Rutgers
49.8
639 primary · 69.9 efficiency · 30.1 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
10
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.8667
South Brunswick · Monmouth Junction, NJ
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,263
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.