Usage Score
37.9
Player Dossier
2009-2010Pittsburgh
Dion Lewis
RB • 5'8" • Albany, NY, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Dion Lewis leans workhorse runner traits and 50.3 efficiency.
Efficiency
50.3
Consistency
59
Season Value
54.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
09091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dion Lewis, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh. Dion Lewis leans workhorse runner traits and 50.3 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Pittsburgh paired 1,988 primary output with 59.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
106.4
Efficiency
50.3
Usage
37.9
Consistency
59
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 105. Utah: 84. Unknown: 79. Miami: 48. Notre Dame: 84. Syracuse: 87. Rutgers: 143. Louisville: 76. UConn: 127. South Florida: 105. West Virginia: 64. Cincinnati: 275
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 22 by 49.7. Utah: 26 by 32.2. Unknown: 15 by 38.8. Miami: 14 by 35.6. Notre Dame: 16 by 52.2. Syracuse: 16 by 57.5. Rutgers: 18 by 80.9. Louisville: 19 by 39.2. UConn: 18 by 66.4. South Florida: 22 by 49.7. West Virginia: 16 by 36. Cincinnati: 44 by 64.9
Split Comparison
Wins131.8 · n=6 · +50.4 vs Losses
Losses81.4 · n=5 · -50.4 vs Wins
First Half81.2 · n=6 · -50.5 vs Second Half
Second Half131.7 · n=6 · +50.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Best efficiency game
80.9 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/8 | @ Kentucky100 rush yards | W 27-10 | 22 | 105 | 4.80 | 1 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Cincinnati100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 28-10 | 42 | 261 | 6.20 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 6.3 |
| Fri 11/26 | vs West Virginia | L 10-35 | 11 | 34 | 3.10 | 0 | 5 | 30 | 4 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ South Florida100 rush yards | W 17-10 | 22 | 105 | 4.80 | 1 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Fri 11/12 | @ UConn2+ TD | L 28-30 | 13 | 77 | 5.90 | 2 | 5 | 50 | 7.1 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Louisville | W 20-3 | 18 | 65 | 3.60 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Rutgers100 rush yards | W 41-21 | 17 | 130 | 7.60 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 7.9 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Syracuse | W 45-14 | 14 | 78 | 5.60 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Notre Dame | L 17-23 | 13 | 63 | 4.80 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 5.3 |
| Thu 9/23 | vs Miami | L 3-31 | 12 | 41 | 3.40 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3.4 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | 10 | 27 | 2.70 | 1 | 5 | 52 | 5.3 |
| Fri 9/3 | @ Utah | L 24-27 | 25 | 75 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3.2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,988 | 59.3 | 51.2 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,988 | 59.3 | 51.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 1,277 | 50.3 | 37.9 | -711 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1,277 | 50.3 | 37.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
236
Primary metric
236 scrimmage yards and 61.2 usage.
#2
Cincinnati
275
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
275 scrimmage yards and 73.3 usage.
#3
Cincinnati
228
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
228 scrimmage yards and 76.5 usage.
#4
West Virginia
169
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169 scrimmage yards and 62.2 usage.
#5
Notre Dame
160
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
160 scrimmage yards and 48.9 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Pittsburgh
1,988 primary output · 59.3 efficiency · 51.2 usage
72.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
72.7
1,988 primary · 59.3 efficiency · 51.2 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Pittsburgh
54.1
1,277 primary · 50.3 efficiency · 37.9 usage
Milestones
17
100+ rush yards
9
150+ scrimmage yards
8
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.75
Brother Rice · Bloomfield Hills, MI
- Committed To
- Holy Cross
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,265
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.