Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2011-2013Middle Tennessee
Kyle Griswould
WR • 5'10" • Columbus, GA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Kyle Griswould reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
53.4
Consistency
37.4
Season Value
48.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
11121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kyle Griswould, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee. Kyle Griswould reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Middle Tennessee paired 531 primary output with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 53.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
35.8
Efficiency
53.4
Usage
19.2
Consistency
37.4
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 106. Unknown: 23. North Carolina: 65. Memphis: 8. Florida Atlantic: 31. BYU: 7. East Carolina: 40. North Texas: 17. Marshall: 59. UAB: 3. Florida International: 0. Southern Miss: 5. UTEP: 101
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 9 by 78.5. Unknown: 3 by 51.1. North Carolina: 7 by 61.9. Memphis: 2 by 26.7. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 100. BYU: 2 by 23.3. East Carolina: 6 by 44.4. North Texas: 2 by 56.7. Marshall: 4 by 98.3. UAB: 1 by 20. Florida International: 1 by 0. Southern Miss: 1 by 33.3. UTEP: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins29.6 · n=7 · -17.4 vs Losses
Losses47 · n=5 · +17.4 vs Wins
First Half40 · n=7 · +9.2 vs Second Half
Second Half30.8 · n=6 · -9.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Navy
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/30 | @ Navy100 receiving yards · High volume | L 6-24 | — | 9 | 106 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 48-17 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 0 | 69 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Southern Miss | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Florida International | W 48-0 | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ UAB | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Thu 10/24 | vs Marshall | W 51-49 | — | 4 | 59 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ North Texas | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs East Carolina | L 17-24 | — | 6 | 40 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ BYU | L 10-37 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 42-35 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Memphis | W 17-15 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/7 | @ North Carolina | L 20-40 | — | 7 | 65 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Thu 8/29 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 286 | 62.6 | 10.5 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 531 | 65.4 | 21.2 | 245 |
| 2013 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 465 | 53.4 | 19.2 | -66 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 465 | 53.4 | 19.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
106
Primary metric
106 receiving yards with a 78.5 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UL Monroe
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 94.3 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 98.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
531 primary output · 65.4 efficiency · 21.2 usage
57.8
#2
2013 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
48.9
465 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
48.9
465 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,282
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.