Usage Score
32.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Arkansas
WR • 6'3" • Texarkana, TX, USA
Cobi Hamilton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
32.9
Efficiency
80.4
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
67
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Arkansas
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cobi Hamilton, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Arkansas. Cobi Hamilton reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 1,335 primary output with 80.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
111.3
Efficiency
80.4
Usage
32.9
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 13. UL Monroe: 99. Alabama: 14. Rutgers: 303. Texas A&M: 162. Auburn: 86. Kentucky: 77. Ole Miss: 146. Tulsa: 177. South Carolina: 72. Mississippi State: 88. LSU: 98
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 43.3. UL Monroe: 6 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 46.7. Rutgers: 10 by 100. Texas A&M: 11 by 98.2. Auburn: 7 by 81.9. Kentucky: 8 by 64.2. Ole Miss: 12 by 81.1. Tulsa: 11 by 100. South Carolina: 4 by 100. Mississippi State: 7 by 83.8. LSU: 10 by 65.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
100 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/23 | vs LSUHigh volume | L 13-20 | — | 10 | 98 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Mississippi State | L 14-45 | — | 7 | 88 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ South Carolina | L 20-38 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | W 19-15 | — | 11 | 177 | 16.1 | 16.10 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Ole Miss100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-30 | — | 12 | 146 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs KentuckyHigh volume | W 49-7 | — | 8 | 77 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Auburn | W 24-7 | — | 7 | 86 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 41 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-58 | — | 11 | 162 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | L 26-35 | — | 10 | 303 | 30.3 | 30.30 | 3 | 80 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Alabama | L 0-52 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs UL Monroe | L 31-34 | — | 6 | 99 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arkansas
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Arkansas | 347 | 76.3 | 10 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arkansas | 347 | 76.3 | 10 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Arkansas | 630 | 90.7 | 13.7 | 283 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arkansas | 630 | 90.7 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Arkansas | 542 | 82.4 | 11.5 | -88 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Arkansas | 542 | 82.4 | 11.5 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Arkansas | 1,335 | 80.4 | 32.9 | 793 |
#1 Featured game
Rutgers
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
303
Primary metric
303 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
LSU
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
132
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Mississippi State
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulsa
177
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
177 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Arkansas
1,335 primary output · 80.4 efficiency · 32.9 usage
67
#2
2010 Postseason · Arkansas
49.2
630 primary · 90.7 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Arkansas
49.2
630 primary · 90.7 efficiency · 13.7 usage
8
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.76
Mountain View · Vancouver, WA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,854
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Cobi Hamilton quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit