Usage Score
20.4
Player Dossier
2009-2011Oregon
Lavasier Tuinei
WR • 6'5" • Arcadia, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Lavasier Tuinei reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.5
Consistency
32.4
Season Value
55.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Oregon
090910101111
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lavasier Tuinei, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Oregon. Lavasier Tuinei reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Oregon paired 396 primary output with 72.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 68.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Postseason · Oregon
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
42.8
Efficiency
68.5
Usage
20.4
Consistency
32.4
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 158. LSU: 47. Nevada: 25. Unknown: 90. Arizona: 15. California: 13. Arizona State: 28. Colorado: 31. Washington State: 86. Washington: 25. Stanford: 12. USC: 34. Oregon State: 15. UCLA: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 8 by 100. LSU: 7 by 44.8. Nevada: 3 by 55.6. Unknown: 4 by 100. Arizona: 1 by 100. California: 2 by 43.3. Arizona State: 2 by 93.3. Colorado: 1 by 100. Washington State: 4 by 100. Washington: 4 by 41.7. Stanford: 2 by 40. USC: 5 by 45.3. Oregon State: 2 by 50. UCLA: 3 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Wins38.9 · n=11 · -1.6 vs Losses
Losses40.5 · n=2 · +1.6 vs Wins
First Half53.7 · n=7 · +21.9 vs Second Half
Second Half31.9 · n=7 · -21.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs Wisconsin100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-38 | — | 8 | 158 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 2 | 41 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs UCLA | W 49-31 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Oregon State | W 49-21 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/20 | vs USC | L 35-38 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Stanford | W 53-30 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 8 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Washington | W 34-17 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Washington State2+ TD | W 43-28 | — | 4 | 86 | 21.5 | 21.50 | 2 | 55 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Colorado | W 45-2 | — | 1 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 31 |
| Sun 10/16 | vs Arizona State | W 41-27 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 28 |
| Fri 10/7 | vs California | W 43-15 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 10 |
| Sun 9/25 | @ Arizona | W 56-31 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 4 | 90 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Nevada | W 69-20 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ LSU | L 27-40 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920092010201020112011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Oregon | 217 | 54 | 16.1 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oregon | 217 | 54 | 16.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oregon | 396 | 72.6 | 17.7 | 179 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oregon | 396 | 72.6 | 17.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Oregon | 599 | 68.5 | 20.4 | 203 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Oregon | 599 | 68.5 | 20.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Wisconsin
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
158
Primary metric
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
USC
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 74.3 efficiency score.
#4
Auburn
75
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
USC
53
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
53 receiving yards with a 88.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Oregon
396 primary output · 72.6 efficiency · 17.7 usage
61.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Oregon
61.4
396 primary · 72.6 efficiency · 17.7 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Oregon
55.3
599 primary · 68.5 efficiency · 20.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,212
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.