Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2013Rice
RB • 6'1" • Schertz, TX, USA
Charles Ross leans workhorse runner traits and 60.5 efficiency.
Usage / Role
7%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
16
Developing production for a back
Reliability
18
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
30
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Rice
Snapshot
Player Story
Charles Ross built his college career from 2009 through 2013 as a running back from Schertz, TX wearing No. 12, spending time with Rice. The clearest part of Charles Ross' career was his backfield work: 2,689 rushing...
Read the storyCharles Ross, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Postseason · Rice. Charles Ross leans workhorse runner traits and 60.5 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 12 | 621 | 491 | 130 | 11 | 53 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 10 | 68 | 69 | -1 | 3 | 20.4 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 4 | 99 | 49 | 50 | 0 | 37.4 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 13 | 61 | 57 | 4 | 1 | 56 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 13 | 837 | 743 | 94 | 5 | 56 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rice | 12 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 78.1 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 12 | 1,289 | 1,252 | 37 | 15 | 78.1 |
Related Context
Charles Ross played RB for Rice. Across 5 tracked seasons, Charles Ross recorded 2,689 rushing yards, 314 receiving yards, and 36 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Rice paired 1,317 primary output with 60.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 30.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Loss with 31 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
6.8
Efficiency
30.3
Usage
3.8
Consistency
35.4
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas: 9. North Texas: 5. Northwestern: 31. Baylor: 1. SMU: 4. UCF: -1. Tulsa: 8. Tulane: 3. East Carolina: 8. UAB: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas: 3 by 31.3. North Texas: 4 by 17.7. Northwestern: 3 by 93.1. Baylor: 1 by 10.4. SMU: 2 by 20.8. UCF: 2 by 0. Tulsa: 2 by 41.7. Tulane: 2 by 15.6. East Carolina: 2 by 41.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
93.1 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs UAB | W 28-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | vs East Carolina | W 62-38 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Tulane | L 49-54 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Tulsa | L 27-64 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 0 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ UCF | L 14-41 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | — | — | -0.5 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs SMU | L 31-42 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Baylor | L 13-30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Northwestern | L 13-30 | 3 | 31 | 10.30 | 0 | — | — | 10.3 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ North Texas | W 32-31 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 1.3 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Texas | L 17-34 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 3 |
Player Story
Charles Ross built his college career from 2009 through 2013 as a running back from Schertz, TX wearing No. 12, spending time with Rice. The clearest part of Charles Ross' career was his backfield work: 2,689 rushing yards, 487 carries, 34 rushing touchdowns, and 314 receiving yards across 51 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2013 with Rice. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 314 receiving yards and 915 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 51 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Rice.
The arc is straightforward: Charles Ross moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 621 | 51.5 | 17.9 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Rice | 68 | 30.3 | 3.8 | -553 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rice | 99 | 52.7 | 7 | 31 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rice | 898 | 48.2 | 18.1 | 799 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rice | 898 | 48.2 | 18.1 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rice | 1,317 | 60.5 | 29.1 | 419 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rice | 1,317 | 60.5 | 29.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Louisiana Tech
Week 12 · W 52-14 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
215
Scrimmage Yards
92.7 takeover
215 scrimmage yards and 33.3 usage.
#2
@ UTEP
Week 13 · W 33-24 · Conference game
154
Scrimmage Yards
85.4 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
154 scrimmage yards and 30.3 usage.
#3
@ Houston
Week 13 · L 14-73 · Conference game
135
Scrimmage Yards
84.9 takeover
Loss with 135 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
135 scrimmage yards and 22.6 usage.
#4
vs UTEP
Week 9 · W 45-7 · Conference game
152
Scrimmage Yards
82 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
152 scrimmage yards and 38.2 usage.
#5
@ New Mexico State
Week 8 · W 45-19
167
Scrimmage Yards
81.5 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
167 scrimmage yards and 35.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Postseason · Rice
1,317 primary output · 60.5 efficiency · 29.1 usage
78.1
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rice
78.1
1,317 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 29.1 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Rice
56
898 primary · 48.2 efficiency · 18.1 usage
11
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
7
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.