Usage Score
17.6
Player Dossier
2009-2013Temple
Ryan Alderman
WR • 5'9" • Downingtown, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ryan Alderman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.4
Consistency
67.1
Season Value
66.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Temple
0910111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Alderman, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Temple. Ryan Alderman reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Temple paired 548 primary output with 80.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Temple
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
45.7
Efficiency
80.4
Usage
17.6
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 65. Houston: 65. Unknown: 3. Idaho: 88. Louisville: 61. Cincinnati: 23. Army: 0. SMU: 42. Rutgers: 38. UCF: 16. UConn: 96. Memphis: 51
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 4 by 100. Houston: 5 by 86.7. Unknown: 1 by 20. Idaho: 5 by 100. Louisville: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 1 by 100. SMU: 4 by 70. Rutgers: 4 by 63.3. UCF: 2 by 53.3. UConn: 7 by 91.4. Memphis: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins25.5 · n=2 · -29.4 vs Losses
Losses54.9 · n=9 · +29.4 vs Wins
First Half50.8 · n=6 · +10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half40.5 · n=6 · -10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Memphis | W 41-21 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 28 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs UConn | L 21-28 | — | 7 | 96 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs UCF | L 36-39 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Rutgers | L 20-23 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ SMU | L 49-59 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Army | W 33-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Cincinnati | L 20-38 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Louisville | L 7-30 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Idaho | L 24-26 | — | 5 | 88 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Houston | L 13-22 | — | 5 | 65 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-28 | — | 4 | 65 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Temple | 154 | 96.1 | 17.2 | 154 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Temple | 54 | 70 | 10.6 | -100 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Temple | 51 | 65.6 | 16.5 | -3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Temple | 548 | 80.4 | 17.6 | 497 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UConn
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 91.4 efficiency score.
#2
Ohio
73
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#3
Idaho
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisville
61
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
61 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Temple
548 primary output · 80.4 efficiency · 17.6 usage
66.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Temple
41.9
51 primary · 65.6 efficiency · 16.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Temple
38.5
154 primary · 96.1 efficiency · 17.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
807
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.