Usage Score
24.9
Player Dossier
2009-2012Minnesota
A.J. Barker
WR • 6'1" • St. Paul, MN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
A.J. Barker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
95.3
Consistency
63
Season Value
70.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Minnesota
09101112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Minnesota
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
A.J. Barker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season · Minnesota. A.J. Barker reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 577 primary output with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 95.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2012 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Minnesota
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
72.1
Efficiency
95.3
Usage
24.9
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Purdue
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UNLV: 101. Unknown: 29. Western Michigan: 101. Syracuse: 52. Iowa: 74. Northwestern: 49. Wisconsin: 36. Purdue: 135
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UNLV: 3 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 96.7. Western Michigan: 5 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 86.7. Iowa: 5 by 98.7. Northwestern: 3 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 80. Purdue: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins97.3 · n=4 · +44.3 vs Losses
Losses53 · n=3 · -44.3 vs Wins
First Half70.8 · n=4 · -2.8 vs Second Half
Second Half73.5 · n=4 · +2.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/27 | vs Purdue100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 44-28 | — | 5 | 135 | 27 | 27 | 2 | 63 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Wisconsin | L 13-38 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Northwestern | L 13-21 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Iowa | L 13-31 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Syracuse | W 17-10 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Western Michigan100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 28-23 | — | 5 | 101 | 20.2 | 20.20 | 3 | 53 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Fri 8/31 | @ UNLV100 receiving yards | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 101 | 33.7 | 33.70 | 0 | 40 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Minnesota
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
2009201020112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 17 | 100 | 7.1 | 17 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | -17 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Minnesota | 577 | 95.3 | 24.9 | 577 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135
Primary metric
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
17
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UNLV
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 98.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Regular Season · Minnesota
577 primary output · 95.3 efficiency · 24.9 usage
70.5
#2
2010 Regular Season · Minnesota
52.5
17 primary · 100 efficiency · 7.1 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Minnesota
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
594
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 9 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.