Usage Score
17
Player Dossier
2009-2012Missouri
T.J. Moe
WR • 6'0" • O'Fallon, MO, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
T.J. Moe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
65.4
Consistency
54.6
Season Value
44.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Missouri
091010111112
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Missouri
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
T.J. Moe, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Missouri. T.J. Moe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Missouri paired 1,045 primary output with 75.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 65.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Missouri
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.3
Efficiency
65.4
Usage
17
Consistency
54.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 26. Georgia: 45. Arizona State: 88. South Carolina: 13. UCF: 29. Vanderbilt: 30. Alabama: 19. Kentucky: 8. Florida: 12. Tennessee: 33. Syracuse: 70. Texas A&M: 26
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 57.8. Georgia: 6 by 50. Arizona State: 8 by 73.3. South Carolina: 2 by 43.3. UCF: 3 by 64.4. Vanderbilt: 2 by 100. Alabama: 2 by 63.3. Kentucky: 1 by 53.3. Florida: 3 by 26.7. Tennessee: 3 by 73.3. Syracuse: 5 by 93.3. Texas A&M: 2 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins39.5 · n=4 · +8.8 vs Losses
Losses30.7 · n=7 · -8.8 vs Wins
First Half38.5 · n=6 · +10.5 vs Second Half
Second Half28 · n=6 · -10.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Vanderbilt
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | @ Texas A&M | L 29-59 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Syracuse | L 27-31 | — | 5 | 70 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Tennessee | W 51-48 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Florida | L 7-14 | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Kentucky | W 33-10 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Alabama | L 10-42 | — | 2 | 19 | 4.8 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Vanderbilt | L 15-19 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ UCF | W 21-16 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/22 | @ South Carolina | L 10-31 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Arizona StateHigh volume | W 24-20 | — | 8 | 88 | 10.4 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Georgia | L 20-41 | — | 6 | 45 | 7 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 26 | 7 | 8.70 | 1 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Missouri
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Missouri | 8 | 26.7 | 8.7 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Missouri | 1,045 | 75.3 | 30.5 | 1,037 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Missouri | 1,045 | 75.3 | 30.5 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Missouri | 649 | 71.1 | 25.3 | -396 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Missouri | 649 | 71.1 | 25.3 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Missouri | 399 | 65.4 | 17 | -250 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
119
Primary metric
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Oklahoma State
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona State
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
152
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.
#5
San Diego State
119
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
119 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Missouri
1,045 primary output · 75.3 efficiency · 30.5 usage
70.2
#2
2010 Regular Season · Missouri
70.2
1,045 primary · 75.3 efficiency · 30.5 usage
#3
2011 Postseason · Missouri
55.8
649 primary · 71.1 efficiency · 25.3 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,101
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.