Usage Score
29.9
Player Dossier
2009-2013Michigan
Fitzgerald Toussaint
RB • 5'10" • Youngstown, OH, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Fitzgerald Toussaint leans workhorse runner traits and 37.3 efficiency.
Efficiency
37.3
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
53.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan
0910101111121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Fitzgerald Toussaint, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Michigan. Fitzgerald Toussaint leans workhorse runner traits and 37.3 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Michigan paired 989 primary output with 52.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 37.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Michigan
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
70.9
Efficiency
37.3
Usage
29.9
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 2. Central Michigan: 56. Notre Dame: 102. Akron: 98. UConn: 127. Minnesota: 78. Penn State: 27. Indiana: 178. Michigan State: 22. Nebraska: 39. Iowa: 41. Ohio State: 81
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 3 by 9. Central Michigan: 15 by 41. Notre Dame: 23 by 38.6. Akron: 20 by 43.8. UConn: 26 by 51.6. Minnesota: 17 by 47.8. Penn State: 27 by 10.4. Indiana: 33 by 52. Michigan State: 9 by 25.8. Nebraska: 11 by 18.9. Iowa: 10 by 29.6. Ohio State: 9 by 78.8
Split Comparison
Wins106.5 · n=6 · +71.2 vs Losses
Losses35.3 · n=6 · -71.2 vs Wins
First Half77.2 · n=6 · +12.5 vs Second Half
Second Half64.7 · n=6 · -12.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
78.8 vs Ohio State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/29 | @ Kansas State | L 14-31 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Ohio State | L 41-42 | 5 | 33 | 6.60 | 1 | 4 | 48 | 9 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Iowa | L 21-24 | 6 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 29 | 4.1 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Nebraska | L 13-17 | 9 | 6 | 0.70 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 3.5 |
| Sat 11/2 | @ Michigan State | L 6-29 | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2.4 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Indiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 63-47 | 32 | 151 | 4.70 | 4 | 1 | 27 | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Penn State | L 40-43 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Minnesota2+ TD | W 42-13 | 17 | 78 | 4.60 | 2 | — | — | 4.6 |
| Sun 9/22 | @ UConn100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 24-21 | 24 | 120 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 4.9 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Akron | W 28-24 | 19 | 71 | 3.70 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 4.9 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Notre Dame | W 41-30 | 22 | 71 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 4.4 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Central Michigan2+ TD | W 59-9 | 14 | 57 | 4.10 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 3.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201020112011201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Michigan | 92 | 57.1 | 5.1 | 92 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Michigan | 92 | 57.1 | 5.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Michigan | 989 | 52.4 | 28.7 | 897 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Michigan | 989 | 52.4 | 28.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Michigan | 576 | 45.1 | 26.2 | -413 |
| 2013 Postseason | Michigan | 851 | 37.3 | 29.9 | 275 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Michigan | 851 | 37.3 | 29.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
192
Primary metric
192 scrimmage yards and 50.9 usage.
#2
Purdue
170
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
170 scrimmage yards and 32.3 usage.
#3
Bowling Green
66
Primary metric
Win with 66 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
66 scrimmage yards and 2.5 usage.
#4
Northwestern
120
Primary metric
Win with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
120 scrimmage yards and 40.4 usage.
#5
Indiana
178
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
178 scrimmage yards and 44 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Michigan
989 primary output · 52.4 efficiency · 28.7 usage
58.2
#2
2011 Regular Season · Michigan
58.2
989 primary · 52.4 efficiency · 28.7 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Michigan
53.8
851 primary · 37.3 efficiency · 29.9 usage
Milestones
10
100+ rush yards
3
150+ scrimmage yards
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,508
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.