Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2009-2012TCU
Skye Dawson
WR • 5'9" • Mesquite, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Skye Dawson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.7
Consistency
38.9
Season Value
55.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · TCU
091011111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Skye Dawson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · TCU. Skye Dawson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
TCU paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · TCU
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37.9
Efficiency
77.7
Usage
15.3
Consistency
38.9
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 0. Kansas: 31. Virginia: 62. SMU: 30. Iowa State: 57. Baylor: 19. Texas Tech: 154. Oklahoma State: 24. West Virginia: 14. Kansas State: 36. Texas: 1. Oklahoma: 27
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas: 2 by 100. Virginia: 5 by 82.7. SMU: 1 by 100. Iowa State: 4 by 95. Baylor: 2 by 63.3. Texas Tech: 10 by 100. Oklahoma State: 3 by 53.3. West Virginia: 1 by 93.3. Kansas State: 2 by 100. Texas: 1 by 6.7. Oklahoma: 3 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins26.2 · n=6 · -23.5 vs Losses
Losses49.7 · n=6 · +23.5 vs Wins
First Half33.2 · n=6 · -9.5 vs Second Half
Second Half42.7 · n=6 · +9.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kansas State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/30 | @ Michigan State | L 16-17 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Oklahoma | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 27 | 6.8 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/23 | @ Texas | W 20-13 | — | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Kansas State | L 10-23 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ West Virginia | W 39-38 | — | 1 | 14 | 6.3 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Oklahoma State | L 14-36 | — | 3 | 24 | 7.2 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | L 53-56 | — | 10 | 154 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Baylor | W 49-21 | — | 2 | 19 | 8.3 | 9.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Iowa State | L 23-37 | — | 4 | 57 | 13.4 | 14.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ SMU | W 24-16 | — | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Virginia | W 27-7 | — | 5 | 62 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Kansas | W 20-6 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 22 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102011201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | TCU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | TCU | 170 | 59.3 | 8.1 | 170 |
| 2011 Postseason | TCU | 500 | 63.2 | 19.9 | 330 |
| 2011 Regular Season | TCU | 500 | 63.2 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | TCU | 455 | 77.7 | 15.3 | -45 |
| 2012 Regular Season | TCU | 455 | 77.7 | 15.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
111
Primary metric
111 receiving yards with a 92.5 efficiency score.
#2
Texas Tech
154
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
72
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · TCU
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Postseason · TCU
58.5
500 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 19.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · TCU
58.5
500 primary · 63.2 efficiency · 19.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,125
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.