Usage Score
2.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025UT Martin
Corey Yeoman
LB • 6'3" • 240 lbs • Atlantic City, NJ, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Corey Yeoman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Efficiency
14.2
Consistency
3
Season Value
5.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Temple
222325
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Temple • UT Martin
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Yeoman, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Temple. Corey Yeoman shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Temple paired 1 primary output with 14.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 14.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Temple, UT Martin.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Regular Season · Temple
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
14.2
Usage
2.9
Consistency
3
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 1. Rutgers: 0. Unknown: 0. Miami: 0. Tulsa: 0. UTSA: 0. North Texas: 0. SMU: 0. South Florida: 0. UAB: 0. Memphis: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 2 by 18.3. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. Miami: 3 by 12.5. Tulsa: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. North Texas: 1 by 4.2. SMU: 5 by 20.8. South Florida: 5 by 20.8. UAB: 8 by 33.3. Memphis: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses0 · Games = 9
First Half0.2 · Games = 6 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half
All Games0.1 · Games = 11
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
33.3 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Memphis | L 21-45 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ UAB | L 24-34 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ South Florida | L 23-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/20 | vs SMU | L 0-55 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ North Texas | L 14-45 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs UTSA | L 34-49 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 9/28 | @ Tulsa | L 26-48 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Miami | L 7-41 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Rutgers | L 7-36 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Akron | W 24-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2022-2023
Opening stop
- 2
UT Martin
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
202220232025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2023 Regular Season | Temple | 1 | 14.2 | 2.9 | 1 |
| 2025 Regular Season | UT Martin | 0 | — | — | -1 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 42.9 takeover score.
#2
UAB
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 12.9 takeover score.
#3
South Florida
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7.9 takeover score.
#4
SMU
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 7.9 takeover score.
#5
Miami
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 4.9 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Temple
1 primary output · 14.2 efficiency · 2.9 usage
5.7
#2
2022 Regular Season · Temple
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · UT Martin
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2026 · Rating 0.82
Bakersfield Christian · Bakersfield, CA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2026
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
35
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.