Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2011Toledo
WR • 5'10" • Toledo, OH, USA
Eric Page reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
83
High-end production for a receiver
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
64
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo
Snapshot
Player Story
Eric Page built his college career from 2009 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Toledo, OH wearing No. 12, spending time with Toledo. The clearest part of Eric Page's career was his receiving role: 290 catches,...
Read the storyEric Page, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Toledo. Eric Page reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 12 | 82 | 1,159 | 8 | 89.1 |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 13 | 5 | 24 | 0 | 86 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 13 | 94 | 1,081 | 14 | 86 |
| 2011 Postseason | Toledo | 12 | 13 | 59 | 1 | 76.9 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 12 | 96 | 978 | 11 | 76.9 |
Related Context
Eric Page played WR for Toledo. Across 3 tracked seasons, Eric Page recorded 104 passing yards, 52 rushing yards, and 3,301 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Toledo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Toledo paired 1,159 primary output with 83.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
86.4
Efficiency
61.6
Usage
41.4
Consistency
56.4
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 59. New Hampshire: 60. Ohio State: 145. Boise State: 69. Syracuse: 168. Temple: 26. Eastern Michigan: 109. Bowling Green: 37. Miami (OH): 51. Northern Illinois: 149. Western Michigan: 68. Central Michigan: 96
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 13 by 30.3. New Hampshire: 5 by 80. Ohio State: 12 by 80.6. Boise State: 8 by 57.5. Syracuse: 14 by 80. Temple: 4 by 43.3. Eastern Michigan: 11 by 66.1. Bowling Green: 6 by 41.1. Miami (OH): 6 by 56.7. Northern Illinois: 9 by 100. Western Michigan: 10 by 45.3. Central Michigan: 11 by 58.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | @ Air ForceHigh volume | W 42-41 | — | 13 | 59 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Central MichiganHigh volume | W 44-17 | — | 11 | 96 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Wed 11/9 | vs Western MichiganHigh volume | W 66-63 | — | 10 | 68 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Tue 11/1 | vs Northern Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | L 60-63 | — | 9 | 149 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 5 | 60 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Miami (OH) | W 49-28 | — | 6 | 51 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Bowling Green | W 28-21 | — | 6 | 37 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 54-16 | — | 11 | 109 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Temple | W 36-13 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Syracuse100 receiving yards · High volume | L 30-33 | — | 14 | 168 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 42 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Boise StateHigh volume | L 15-40 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 22-27 | — | 12 | 145 | 10.8 | 12.10 | 2 | 66 |
| Thu 9/1 | vs New Hampshire | W 58-22 | — | 5 | 60 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 24 |
Player Story
Eric Page built his college career from 2009 through 2011 as a wide receiver from Toledo, OH wearing No. 12, spending time with Toledo. The clearest part of Eric Page's career was his receiving role: 290 catches, 3,301 receiving yards, 24 touchdowns, and 52 rushing yards across 37 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2011 with Toledo. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 104 passing yards, 52 rushing yards, and 2,509 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 37 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Toledo.
The arc is straightforward: Eric Page moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Toledo
2009-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,159 | 83.1 | 30.6 | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Toledo | 1,105 | 73.8 | 42.2 | -54 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,105 | 73.8 | 42.2 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Toledo | 1,037 | 61.6 | 41.4 | -68 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,037 | 61.6 | 41.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Ball State
Week 5 · W 37-30 · Conference game
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152
Receiving Yards
97.4 takeover
152 receiving yards with a 92.1 efficiency score.
#2
vs Northern Illinois
Week 10 · L 60-63 · Conference game
149
Receiving Yards
96.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Ball State
Week 8 · W 31-24 · Conference game
110
Receiving Yards
95.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
@ Bowling Green
Week 13 · L 24-38 · Conference game
130
Receiving Yards
95.2 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
130 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Syracuse
Week 4 · L 30-33
168
Receiving Yards
93.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
168 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
1,159 primary output · 83.1 efficiency · 30.6 usage
89.1
#2
2010 Postseason · Toledo
86
1,105 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 42.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Toledo
86
1,105 primary · 73.8 efficiency · 42.2 usage
16
100+ receiving yards
17
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.