Usage Score
8.8
Player Dossier
2009-2013Troy
Corey Robinson
QB • 6'1" • Paducah, KY, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Corey Robinson is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.2
Consistency
77.7
Season Value
60
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Troy
091010111213
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Troy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Corey Robinson, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Troy. Corey Robinson is a balanced quarterback profile with 8.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Troy paired 3,626 primary output with 55.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with 316 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency. It landed in the 66.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Regular Season · Troy
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
259
Efficiency
58.2
Usage
8.8
Consistency
77.7
Best Game by takeover score
Texas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 316. Unknown: 183. Arkansas State: 353. Mississippi State: 108. Duke: 346. South Alabama: 176. Georgia State: 343. Western Kentucky: 299. UL Monroe: 352. Louisiana: 278. Ole Miss: 227. Texas State: 127
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 36 by 69.2. Unknown: 20 by 74.6. Arkansas State: 53 by 49. Mississippi State: 26 by 52.3. Duke: 49 by 58.6. South Alabama: 29 by 61.1. Georgia State: 40 by 53.5. Western Kentucky: 36 by 57.4. UL Monroe: 55 by 54.4. Louisiana: 47 by 57.9. Ole Miss: 41 by 53.8. Texas State: 24 by 56.9
Split Comparison
Wins252.2 · n=5 · -25.1 vs Losses
Losses277.3 · n=6 · +25.1 vs Wins
First Half247 · n=6 · -24 vs Second Half
Second Half271 · n=6 · +24 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
74.6 vs Unknown
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | vs Texas State | W 42-28 | 17 | 22 | 133 | 77.3 | 1 | 0 | 56.9 | 2 | -6 | -3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Ole Miss | L 21-51 | 24 | 36 | 258 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 53.8 | 5 | -31 | -6.20 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 11/8 | @ Louisiana | L 36-41 | 25 | 44 | 271 | 56.8 | 1 | 0 | 57.9 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Thu 10/31 | vs UL Monroe300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 37-49 | 31 | 52 | 362 | 59.6 | 2 | 0 | 54.4 | 3 | -10 | -3.30 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Western Kentucky300-yard game | W 32-26 | 20 | 32 | 306 | 62.5 | 1 | 1 | 57.4 | 4 | -7 | -1.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Georgia State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 35-28 | 21 | 37 | 350 | 56.8 | 3 | 2 | 53.5 | 3 | -7 | -2.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs South Alabama | W 34-33 | 20 | 26 | 210 | 76.9 | 2 | 0 | 61.1 | 3 | -34 | -11.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Duke300-yard game | L 31-38 | 35 | 45 | 354 | 77.8 | 2 | 1 | 58.6 | 4 | -8 | -2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/21 | @ Mississippi State | L 7-62 | 15 | 25 | 105 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 52.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Thu 9/12 | @ Arkansas State300-yard game | L 34-41 | 30 | 51 | 371 | 58.8 | 2 | 3 | 49 | 2 | -18 | -9 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown3+ TD | — | 17 | 19 | 180 | 89.5 | 4 | 0 | 74.6 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs UAB300-yard game | W 34-31 | 30 | 32 | 319 | 93.8 | 1 | 0 | 69.2 | 4 | -3 | -0.80 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Troy
2009-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
200920102010201120122013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | Troy | 3,626 | 55.9 | 10.7 | 3,626 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Troy | 3,626 | 55.9 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Troy | 3,039 | 55.9 | 14.2 | -587 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Troy | 3,074 | 59.7 | 5.7 | 35 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Troy | 3,108 | 58.2 | 8.8 | 34 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Navy
Win with 322 yards of offense and 95 efficiency.
322
Primary metric
322 total offense with 95 efficiency.
#2
Arkansas
406
Primary metric
Loss with 406 yards of offense and 75 efficiency.
406 total offense with 75 efficiency.
#3
Ohio
392
Primary metric
Win with 392 yards of offense and 75.7 efficiency.
392 total offense with 75.7 efficiency.
#4
Western Kentucky
329
Primary metric
Win with 329 yards of offense and 76.2 efficiency.
329 total offense with 76.2 efficiency.
#5
UAB
316
Primary metric
Win with 316 yards of offense and 69.2 efficiency.
316 total offense with 69.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Troy
3,626 primary output · 55.9 efficiency · 10.7 usage
62.5
#2
2010 Regular Season · Troy
62.5
3,626 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Troy
60.7
3,039 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 14.2 usage
Milestones
30
250+ passing yards
21
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
11
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
12,847
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.