Usage Score
12.1
Player Profile
Clint Moseley
QB • 6'4" • Leroy, AL, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Clint Moseley is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
43.1
Consistency
69.2
Season Value
41.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Auburn
0910111112
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Auburn
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Auburn
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Clint Moseley, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Auburn. Clint Moseley is a balanced quarterback profile with 12.1 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Auburn paired 719 primary output with 62.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 43.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Regular Season · Auburn
Games
4
Primary Metric / G
74.8
Efficiency
43.1
Usage
12.1
Consistency
69.2
Best Game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arkansas: 120. Ole Miss: 110. Vanderbilt: 77. Texas A&M: -8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arkansas: 25 by 47.1. Ole Miss: 25 by 47.7. Vanderbilt: 25 by 52.7. Texas A&M: 2 by 25
Split Comparison
Losses74.8 · n=4
First Half115 · n=2 · +80.5 vs Second Half
Second Half34.5 · n=2 · -80.5 vs First Half
All Games74.8 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
52.7 vs Vanderbilt
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Auburn
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010201120112012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Auburn | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Auburn | 8 | 40 | 6.1 | 8 |
| 2011 Postseason | Auburn | 719 | 62.4 | 10.7 | 711 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Auburn | 719 | 62.4 | 10.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Auburn | 299 | 43.1 | 12.1 | -420 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 177 yards of offense and 67 efficiency.
177
Primary metric
177 total offense with 67 efficiency.
#2
Utah State
25
Primary metric
Win with 25 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
25 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Arkansas
120
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
120 total offense with 47.1 efficiency.
#4
Ole Miss
110
Primary metric
Loss with 110 yards of offense and 47.7 efficiency.
110 total offense with 47.7 efficiency.
#5
Ole Miss
146
Primary metric
Win with 146 yards of offense and 67.2 efficiency.
146 total offense with 67.2 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Auburn
719 primary output · 62.4 efficiency · 10.7 usage
58.4
#2
2011 Regular Season · Auburn
58.4
719 primary · 62.4 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Auburn
41.5
299 primary · 43.1 efficiency · 12.1 usage
Milestones
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
5
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,026
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.