Usage / Role
29%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2009-2012Texas A&M
RB • 5'11" • Beaumont, TX, USA
Christine Michael leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.2 efficiency.
Usage / Role
29%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
62
Solid production for a back
Reliability
69
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
75
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Player Story
Christine Michael built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Beaumont, TX wearing No. 33, spending time with Texas A&M. The clearest part of Christine Michael's career was his backfield...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Christine Michael, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Christine Michael leans balanced backfield option traits and 50.2 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 12 | 77 | 77 | 0 | 1 | 73.2 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 12 | 833 | 767 | 66 | 9 | 73.2 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 8 | 805 | 631 | 174 | 4 | 73.6 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 9 | 934 | 899 | 35 | 9 | 74.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 11 | 465 | 417 | 48 | 12 | 50.1 |
Related Context
Christine Michael played RB for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Christine Michael recorded 2,791 rushing yards, 323 receiving yards, and 35 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Texas A&M.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 934 primary output with 63.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 50.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2012 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Win with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
42.3
Efficiency
50.2
Usage
13.1
Consistency
63
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 48. South Carolina State: 32. Arkansas: 24. Ole Miss: 35. Louisiana Tech: 65. LSU: 28. Auburn: 75. Mississippi State: 50. Alabama: 27. Sam Houston: 9. Missouri: 72
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 16 by 28.4. South Carolina State: 8 by 39.9. Arkansas: 5 by 50. Ole Miss: 6 by 57.1. Louisiana Tech: 12 by 56.4. LSU: 9 by 34.1. Auburn: 9 by 84.7. Mississippi State: 11 by 47.3. Alabama: 12 by 23.4. Sam Houston: 3 by 31.3. Missouri: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Auburn
Best efficiency game
100 vs Missouri
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs Missouri2+ TD | W 59-29 | 4 | 60 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 14.4 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Sam Houston | W 47-28 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Alabama2+ TD | W 29-24 | 12 | 27 | 2.30 | 2 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Mississippi State2+ TD | W 38-13 | 11 | 50 | 4.50 | 2 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Auburn | W 63-21 | 9 | 75 | 8.30 | 1 | — | — | 8.3 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs LSU | L 19-24 | 8 | 27 | 3.40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3.1 |
| Sun 10/14 | @ Louisiana Tech | W 59-57 | 12 | 65 | 5.40 | 1 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Ole Miss | W 30-27 | 4 | 21 | 5.30 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 5.8 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Arkansas | W 58-10 | 5 | 24 | 4.80 | 1 | — | — | 4.8 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs South Carolina State | W 70-14 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Florida | L 17-20 | 13 | 33 | 2.50 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 3 |
Player Story
Christine Michael built his college career from 2009 through 2012 as a running back from Beaumont, TX wearing No. 33, spending time with Texas A&M. The clearest part of Christine Michael's career was his backfield work: 2,791 rushing yards, 529 carries, 34 rushing touchdowns, and 323 receiving yards across 40 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2009 with Texas A&M. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 323 receiving yards and 217 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 40 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Texas A&M.
The arc is straightforward: Christine Michael moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 910 | 51.9 | 24.5 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 910 | 51.9 | 24.5 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 805 | 57 | 26.8 | -105 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 934 | 63.3 | 25.4 | 129 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 465 | 50.2 | 13.1 | -469 |
#1 Featured game
@ Arkansas
Week 5 · L 38-42
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
237
Scrimmage Yards
91.3 takeover
237 scrimmage yards and 43 usage.
#2
vs Utah State
Week 3 · W 38-30
120
Scrimmage Yards
82.1 takeover
Win with 120 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
120 scrimmage yards and 30.2 usage.
#3
vs Florida International
Week 3 · W 27-20
125
Scrimmage Yards
80.6 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
125 scrimmage yards and 40.7 usage.
#4
vs Missouri
Week 7 · L 9-30 · Conference game
146
Scrimmage Yards
80.3 takeover
Loss with 146 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
146 scrimmage yards and 30.5 usage.
#5
@ Texas Tech
Week 8 · W 52-30 · Conference game
121
Scrimmage Yards
80 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
121 scrimmage yards and 28.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Regular Season · Texas A&M
934 primary output · 63.3 efficiency · 25.4 usage
74.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · Texas A&M
73.6
805 primary · 57 efficiency · 26.8 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
73.2
910 primary · 51.9 efficiency · 24.5 usage
9
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
9
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.