Usage Score
16
Player Dossier
2022-2025Penn State
QB • 6'5" • 235 lbs • Medina, OH, USA
Drew Allar is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
16
Efficiency
66.8
Consistency
75.8
Season Value
64.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Drew Allar, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Penn State. Drew Allar is a balanced quarterback profile with 18.2 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Penn State paired 3,629 primary output with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
16
Primary Metric / G
226.8
Efficiency
66.8
Usage
16
Consistency
75.8
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 152. Boise State: 167. SMU: 137. West Virginia: 260. Bowling Green: 211. Kent State: 335. Illinois: 150. UCLA: 234. USC: 423. Wisconsin: 156. Ohio State: 177. Washington: 232. Purdue: 269. Minnesota: 252. Maryland: 194. Oregon: 280
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 29 by 53. Boise State: 36 by 52.3. SMU: 29 by 55.4. West Virginia: 23 by 84.5. Bowling Green: 27 by 60. Kent State: 26 by 83.2. Illinois: 25 by 65.6. UCLA: 28 by 63.3. USC: 47 by 74.4. Wisconsin: 22 by 66.6. Ohio State: 30 by 58. Washington: 31 by 69.2. Purdue: 23 by 86.1. Minnesota: 37 by 64.1. Maryland: 33 by 63.3. Oregon: 44 by 69.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
16 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
86.1 vs Purdue
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/10 | vs Notre Dame | L 24-27 | 12 | 23 | 135 | 52.2 | 0 | 1 | 53 | 6 | 17 | 2.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Wed 1/1 | @ Boise State3+ TD | W 31-14 | 13 | 25 | 171 | 52.0 | 3 | 0 | 52.3 | 11 | -4 | -0.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 12/21 | vs SMU | W 38-10 | 13 | 22 | 127 | 59.1 | 0 | 0 | 55.4 | 7 | 10 | 1.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 12/8 | @ Oregon3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 37-45 | 20 | 39 | 226 | 51.3 | 3 | 2 | 69.8 | 5 | 54 | 10.80 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/30 | vs Maryland | W 44-7 | 17 | 26 | 171 | 65.4 | 1 | 0 | 63.3 | 7 | 23 | 3.30 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Minnesota | W 26-25 | 21 | 28 | 244 | 75.0 | 1 | 0 | 64.1 | 9 | 8 | 0.90 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/16 | @ Purdue3+ TD | W 49-10 | 17 | 19 | 247 | 89.5 | 3 | 0 | 86.1 | 4 | 22 | 5.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Washington | W 35-6 | 20 | 28 | 220 | 71.4 | 1 | 0 | 69.2 | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Ohio State | L 13-20 | 12 | 20 | 146 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 58 | 10 | 31 | 3.10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Wisconsin | W 28-13 | 14 | 18 | 148 | 77.8 | 1 | 0 | 66.6 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/12 | @ USC300-yard game | W 33-30 | 30 | 43 | 391 | 69.8 | 2 | 3 | 74.4 | 4 | 32 | 8 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs UCLA | W 27-11 | 17 | 24 | 237 | 70.8 | 1 | 0 | 63.3 | 4 | -3 | -0.80 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Illinois | W 21-7 | 15 | 21 | 135 | 71.4 | 0 | 0 | 65.6 | 4 | 15 | 3.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Kent State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-0 | 17 | 21 | 309 | 81.0 | 3 | 0 | 83.2 | 5 | 26 | 5.20 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Bowling Green3+ TD | W 34-27 | 13 | 20 | 204 | 65.0 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 8/31 | @ West Virginia3+ TD | W 34-12 | 11 | 17 | 216 | 64.7 | 3 | 0 | 84.5 | 6 | 44 | 7.30 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2022-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Penn State | 396 | 61.7 | 8.6 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Penn State | 396 | 61.7 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Penn State | 2,841 | 62.7 | 15 | 2,445 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Penn State | 2,841 | 62.7 | 15 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Penn State | 3,629 | 66.8 | 16 | 788 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Penn State | 3,629 | 66.8 | 16 | 0 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Penn State | 1,272 | 65.5 | 18.2 | -2,357 |
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
278
Primary metric
278 total offense with 77 efficiency.
#2
Auburn
29
Primary metric
Win with 29 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
29 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
Ole Miss
335
Primary metric
Loss with 335 yards of offense and 70.4 efficiency.
335 total offense with 70.4 efficiency.
#4
USC
423
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
423 total offense with 74.4 efficiency.
#5
Ohio
99
Primary metric
Win with 99 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
99 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Penn State
3,629 primary output · 66.8 efficiency · 16 usage
64.6
#2
2024 Regular Season · Penn State
64.6
3,629 primary · 66.8 efficiency · 16 usage
#3
2023 Postseason · Penn State
61.3
2,841 primary · 62.7 efficiency · 15 usage
11
250+ passing yards
4
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
29
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9852
Medina · Medina, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
8,138
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Drew Allar quick answers
Recruiting profile
5-star recruit