Usage Score
27.8
Player Dossier
2021-2025Michigan
WR • 5'11" • 186 lbs • Hartford, CT, USA
Anthony Simpson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27.8
Efficiency
74.9
Consistency
58.5
Season Value
62.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Simpson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts. Anthony Simpson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2023 Regular Season
Massachusetts paired 792 primary output with 74.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 74.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Arizona, Massachusetts, Michigan.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
66
Efficiency
74.9
Usage
27.8
Consistency
58.5
Best Game by takeover score
UConn
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 89. New Mexico State: 65. Miami (OH): 34. Eastern Michigan: 101. New Mexico: 104. Arkansas State: 33. Toledo: 140. Penn State: 2. Army: 36. Unknown: 33. Liberty: 48. UConn: 107
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 4 by 100. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Miami (OH): 3 by 75.6. Eastern Michigan: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 5 by 100. Arkansas State: 7 by 31.4. Toledo: 7 by 100. Penn State: 3 by 4.4. Army: 7 by 34.3. Unknown: 2 by 100. Liberty: 6 by 53.3. UConn: 6 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs UConn100 receiving yards | L 18-31 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Liberty | L 25-49 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 33 | 13.7 | 16.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Army | W 21-14 | — | 7 | 36 | 5.1 | 5.10 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Penn State | L 0-63 | — | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.70 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | L 24-41 | — | 7 | 140 | 17.9 | 20 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arkansas State | L 28-52 | — | 7 | 33 | 6.3 | 4.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards | L 31-34 | — | 5 | 104 | 16.8 | 20.80 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards | L 17-19 | — | 4 | 101 | 21.2 | 25.30 | 0 | 67 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Miami (OH) | L 28-41 | — | 3 | 34 | 7.4 | 11.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Auburn | L 14-59 | — | 4 | 89 | 22.3 | 22.30 | 1 | 58 |
| Sat 8/26 | @ New Mexico State | W 41-30 | — | 3 | 65 | 18.4 | 21.70 | 0 | 27 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Arizona
2021-2022
Opening stop
Massachusetts
2023-2024
Peak year stop
Michigan
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Arizona | 46 | 76.7 | 5 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Arizona | 64 | 41.3 | 4.7 | 18 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 792 | 74.9 | 27.8 | 728 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Massachusetts | 16 | 35 | 6.9 | -776 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Michigan | 0 | — | 0 | -16 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
140
Primary metric
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
107
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah
51
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico
104
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Utah
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2023 Regular Season · Massachusetts
792 primary output · 74.9 efficiency · 27.8 usage
62.6
#2
2025 Regular Season · Michigan
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Arizona
42.7
46 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 5 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
3
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
918
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 29 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Anthony Simpson quick answers