Usage Score
27.9
Player Dossier
2021-2024Akron
Konata Mumpfield
WR • 6'1" • 185 lbs • Hoschton, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Konata Mumpfield reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.4
Consistency
68
Season Value
66
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
2122222324
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Akron • Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boston College
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Konata Mumpfield, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Konata Mumpfield reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 813 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2021 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Akron, Pittsburgh.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2021 Regular Season · Akron
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
62.6
Efficiency
76.4
Usage
27.9
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 19. Temple: 20. Unknown: 69. Ohio State: 67. Ohio: 69. Bowling Green: 106. Miami (OH): 109. Buffalo: 36. Ball State: 67. Western Michigan: 122. Kent State: 39. Toledo: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 3 by 42.2. Temple: 3 by 44.4. Unknown: 5 by 92. Ohio State: 7 by 63.8. Ohio: 4 by 100. Bowling Green: 6 by 100. Miami (OH): 10 by 72.7. Buffalo: 3 by 80. Ball State: 5 by 89.3. Western Michigan: 11 by 73.9. Kent State: 4 by 65. Toledo: 2 by 93.3
Split Comparison
Losses57.6 · n=10
First Half58.3 · n=6 · -8.5 vs Second Half
Second Half66.8 · n=6 · +8.5 vs First Half
All Games62.6 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
100 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Toledo | L 14-49 | — | 2 | 28 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Kent State | L 0-38 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 11/10 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 40-45 | — | 11 | 122 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 2 | 23 |
| Tue 11/2 | vs Ball State | L 25-31 | — | 5 | 67 | 13.4 | 13.40 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Buffalo | L 10-45 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-34 | — | 10 | 109 | 10.9 | 10.90 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 35-20 | — | 6 | 106 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 2 | 48 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Ohio | L 17-34 | — | 4 | 69 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Ohio State | L 7-59 | — | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 1 | 17 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 69 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Temple | L 24-45 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Auburn | L 10-60 | — | 3 | 19 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2021
Opening stop
- 2
Pittsburgh
2022-2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20212022202220232024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Akron | 751 | 76.4 | 27.9 | — |
| 2022 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 551 | 61.3 | 28.8 | -200 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 551 | 61.3 | 28.8 | 0 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 576 | 77.3 | 24.3 | 25 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 813 | 84.1 | 18.6 | 237 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boston College
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
144
Primary metric
144 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Bowling Green
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
West Virginia
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#5
Western Michigan
122
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 73.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
813 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 18.6 usage
66.9
#2
2021 Regular Season · Akron
66
751 primary · 76.4 efficiency · 27.9 usage
#3
2023 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
60.1
576 primary · 77.3 efficiency · 24.3 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8081
Dacula · Dacula, GA
- Committed To
- Akron
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,691
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 48 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.