Usage Score
10.4
Player Profile
DE • 6'2" • 248 lbs • Kansas City, MO, USA
Cashius Howell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Usage Score
10.4
Efficiency
33.7
Consistency
43.6
Season Value
45.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
Quick Facts
Cashius Howell, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Cashius Howell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 33.5 primary output with 33.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 33.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.6
Efficiency
33.7
Usage
10.4
Consistency
43.6
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. UTSA: 0. Utah State: 6. Notre Dame: 2. Auburn: 2. Mississippi State: 7. Florida: 3. Arkansas: 1. LSU: 4. Missouri: 2. South Carolina: 5. Unknown: 0.5. Texas: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 2 by 8.3. UTSA: 1 by 4.2. Utah State: 4 by 66.7. Notre Dame: 3 by 32.5. Auburn: 2 by 28.3. Mississippi State: 3 by 62.5. Florida: 1 by 34.2. Arkansas: 1 by 14.2. LSU: 2 by 48.3. Missouri: 5 by 40.8. South Carolina: 4 by 66.7. Unknown: 1 by 9.2. Texas: 3 by 22.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
66.7 vs South Carolina
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/20 | vs Miami | L 3-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Texas | L 17-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Unknown | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Carolina | W 31-30 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Missouri | W 38-17 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ LSU2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-25 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Arkansas | W 45-42 | 1 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida | W 34-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Mississippi State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-9 | 3 | 3 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Auburn | W 16-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Notre Dame | W 41-40 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Utah State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 44-22 | 4 | 4 | — | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs UTSA | W 42-24 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2021-2023
Opening stop
Texas A&M
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | 12.5 | 2.3 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 5.5 | 15.4 | 5.4 | 5.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 21 | 26.9 | 10.3 | 15.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 21 | 26.9 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 20.5 | 28.6 | 9.2 | -0.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 20.5 | 28.6 | 9.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 33.5 | 33.7 | 10.4 | 13 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 33.5 | 33.7 | 10.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 62.7 takeover score.
#2
Toledo
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#3
Utah State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#4
Kent State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#5
Akron
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
33.5 primary output · 33.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage
45.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
45.2
33.5 primary · 33.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
38.3
0 primary · 12.5 efficiency · 2.3 usage
1
Impact games
9
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8141
Rockhurst · Kansas City, MO
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
125
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Cashius Howell quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit