Usage Score
10.3
Player Dossier
2021-2025Bowling Green
Cashius Howell
DE • 6'2" • 248 lbs • Kansas City, MO, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Cashius Howell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Efficiency
26.9
Consistency
48.3
Season Value
35.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
2122232324242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Bowling Green • Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cashius Howell, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas A&M. Cashius Howell shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.7 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 33.5 primary output with 33.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 26.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Bowling Green, Texas A&M.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.8
Efficiency
26.9
Usage
10.3
Consistency
48.3
Best Game by takeover score
Minnesota
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Liberty: 0. Unknown: 3. Ohio: 2. Georgia Tech: 0. Miami (OH): 0. Buffalo: 1. Akron: 4. Ball State: 2. Kent State: 4. Toledo: 4. Western Michigan: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 1 by 4.2. Liberty: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 3 by 42.5. Ohio: 2 by 28.3. Georgia Tech: 3 by 12.5. Miami (OH): 2 by 8.3. Buffalo: 2 by 18.3. Akron: 3 by 52.5. Ball State: 1 by 24.2. Kent State: 3 by 52.5. Toledo: 3 by 52.5. Western Michigan: 3 by 22.5
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=6 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1.2 · n=5 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half0.8 · n=6 · -1.8 vs Second Half
Second Half2.7 · n=6 · +1.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/26 | @ Minnesota | L 24-30 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/22 | @ Western Michigan | W 34-10 | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | vs Toledo2+ sacks · Splash game | L 31-32 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | @ Kent State2+ sacks · Splash game | W 49-19 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/1 | vs Ball State | W 24-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Akron2+ sacks · Splash game | W 41-14 | 3 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Buffalo | W 24-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Miami (OH) | L 0-27 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Georgia Tech | W 38-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Ohio | L 7-38 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 2 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | @ Liberty | L 24-34 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas A&M
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20212022202320232024202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 0 | 12.5 | 2.3 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 5.5 | 15.4 | 5.4 | 5.5 |
| 2023 Postseason | Bowling Green | 21 | 26.9 | 10.3 | 15.5 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 21 | 26.9 | 10.3 | 0 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas A&M | 20.5 | 28.6 | 9.2 | -0.5 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 20.5 | 28.6 | 9.2 | 0 |
| 2025 Postseason | Texas A&M | 33.5 | 33.7 | 10.4 | 13 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 33.5 | 33.7 | 10.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
7
Primary metric
7 disruption/tackle impact with 62.7 takeover score.
#2
Toledo
4
Primary metric
Loss with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 59 takeover score.
#3
Utah State
6
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#4
Kent State
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#5
Akron
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas A&M
33.5 primary output · 33.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage
45.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas A&M
45.2
33.5 primary · 33.7 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2021 Regular Season · Bowling Green
38.3
0 primary · 12.5 efficiency · 2.3 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
9
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8141
Rockhurst · Kansas City, MO
- Committed To
- Bowling Green
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
125
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 49 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.