Usage Score
20.6
Player Dossier
2021-2025Washington State
De'Zhaun Stribling
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Kapolei, HI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
De'Zhaun Stribling reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85
Consistency
61.5
Season Value
66.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
21212223242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Washington State • Oklahoma State • Ole Miss
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
De'Zhaun Stribling, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. De'Zhaun Stribling reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 892 primary output with 85 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Washington State, Oklahoma State, Ole Miss.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
81.1
Efficiency
85
Usage
20.6
Consistency
61.5
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 83. Arkansas: 38. Tulsa: 174. Utah: 50. Kansas State: 157. West Virginia: 54. Baylor: 15. Arizona State: 77. TCU: 101. Texas Tech: 133. Colorado: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 6 by 92.2. Arkansas: 4 by 63.3. Tulsa: 7 by 100. Utah: 3 by 100. Kansas State: 7 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 100. Baylor: 2 by 50. Arizona State: 5 by 100. TCU: 7 by 96.2. Texas Tech: 7 by 100. Colorado: 2 by 33.3
Split Comparison
Wins106 · n=2 · +31.4 vs Losses
Losses74.6 · n=8 · -31.4 vs Wins
First Half92.7 · n=6 · +25.5 vs Second Half
Second Half67.2 · n=5 · -25.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/29 | @ Colorado | L 0-52 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Texas Tech100 receiving yards | L 48-56 | — | 7 | 133 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 35 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ TCU100 receiving yards | L 13-38 | — | 7 | 101 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Arizona State | L 21-42 | — | 5 | 77 | 15.4 | 15.40 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Baylor | L 28-38 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs West Virginia | L 14-38 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Kansas State100 receiving yards | L 20-42 | — | 7 | 157 | 22.4 | 22.40 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Utah | L 19-22 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-10 | — | 7 | 174 | 24.9 | 24.90 | 2 | 63 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Arkansas | W 39-31 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2021-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Oklahoma State
2023-2024
Peak year stop
- 3
Ole Miss
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2021202120222023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Postseason | Washington State | 471 | 67.9 | 15.4 | — |
| 2021 Regular Season | Washington State | 471 | 67.9 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Washington State | 602 | 74.7 | 17.2 | 131 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 201 | 70.5 | 16.1 | -401 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 892 | 85 | 20.6 | 691 |
| 2025 Postseason | Ole Miss | 811 | 80 | 16 | -81 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 811 | 80 | 16 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174
Primary metric
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
93
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
122
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
157
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
157 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
892 primary output · 85 efficiency · 20.6 usage
66.6
#2
2025 Postseason · Ole Miss
63.2
811 primary · 80 efficiency · 16 usage
#3
2025 Regular Season · Ole Miss
63.2
811 primary · 80 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8206
Kapolei · Kapolei, HI
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
3
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,977
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 55 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.