Usage Score
18.9
Player Dossier
2021-2025Virginia Tech
Christian Moss
WR • 6'3" • 199 lbs • Kennesaw, GA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Christian Moss reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.7
Consistency
69.8
Season Value
67.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State
2122242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Virginia Tech • Kennesaw State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Christian Moss, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State. Christian Moss reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Kennesaw State paired 682 primary output with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Virginia Tech, Kennesaw State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
52.5
Efficiency
81.7
Usage
18.9
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Western Michigan: 12. Indiana: 54. Unknown: 68. Arkansas State: 84. Middle Tennessee: 0. Louisiana Tech: 66. Florida International: 93. UTEP: 6. New Mexico State: 12. Jacksonville State: 72. Missouri State: 68. Liberty: 72. Jacksonville State: 75
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Michigan: 2 by 40. Indiana: 5 by 72. Unknown: 6 by 75.6. Arkansas State: 6 by 93.3. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 100. Florida International: 2 by 100. UTEP: 2 by 20. New Mexico State: 1 by 80. Jacksonville State: 4 by 100. Missouri State: 4 by 100. Liberty: 3 by 100. Jacksonville State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins52.9 · n=9 · +6.9 vs Losses
Losses46 · n=3 · -6.9 vs Wins
First Half53.9 · n=7 · +3.0 vs Second Half
Second Half50.8 · n=6 · -3.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida International
Best efficiency game
100 vs Jacksonville State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/19 | @ Western Michigan | L 6-41 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Jacksonville State | W 19-15 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Liberty | W 48-42 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Missouri State | W 41-34 | — | 4 | 68 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 40 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ Jacksonville State | L 26-35 | — | 4 | 72 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ New Mexico State | W 24-21 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Wed 10/29 | vs UTEP | W 33-20 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Tue 10/21 | @ Florida International | W 45-26 | — | 2 | 93 | 46.5 | 46.50 | 1 | 70 |
| Thu 10/9 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 35-7 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 24-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Arkansas State | W 28-21 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 68 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Indiana | L 9-56 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Virginia Tech
2021-2022
Opening stop
- 2
Kennesaw State
2024-2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20212022202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Virginia Tech | 71 | 83.4 | 12.1 | 71 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kennesaw State | 220 | 72.8 | 14 | 149 |
| 2025 Postseason | Kennesaw State | 682 | 81.7 | 18.9 | 462 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kennesaw State | 682 | 81.7 | 18.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida International
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93
Primary metric
93 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#3
UTEP
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Liberty
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Jacksonville State
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Kennesaw State
682 primary output · 81.7 efficiency · 18.9 usage
67.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Kennesaw State
67.4
682 primary · 81.7 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Virginia Tech
43.9
71 primary · 83.4 efficiency · 12.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
973
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.