Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2021-2024Boston College
Jaden Williams
WR • 5'9" • 185 lbs • Pflugerville, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jaden Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.7
Consistency
65.2
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas State
2122232424
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Boston College • Texas State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaden Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason · Texas State. Jaden Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Postseason
Texas State paired 807 primary output with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 84.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2024 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Boston College, Texas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2024 Postseason · Texas State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
67.3
Efficiency
84.7
Usage
19.2
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 155. Unknown: 69. UTSA: 15. Arizona State: 75. Sam Houston: 133. Troy: 73. Arkansas State: 35. Old Dominion: 35. Louisiana: 47. Southern Miss: 71. Georgia State: 91. South Alabama: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 8 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 65.7. UTSA: 1 by 100. Arizona State: 4 by 100. Sam Houston: 10 by 88.7. Troy: 5 by 97.3. Arkansas State: 2 by 100. Old Dominion: 5 by 46.7. Louisiana: 4 by 78.3. Southern Miss: 3 by 100. Georgia State: 7 by 86.7. South Alabama: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins59.5 · n=6 · -16.7 vs Losses
Losses76.2 · n=5 · +16.7 vs Wins
First Half86.7 · n=6 · +38.8 vs Second Half
Second Half47.8 · n=6 · -38.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/3 | vs North Texas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-28 | — | 8 | 155 | 18.2 | 19.40 | 1 | 70 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ South Alabama | W 45-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/24 | vs Georgia State | L 44-52 | — | 7 | 91 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/17 | vs Southern Miss | W 58-3 | — | 3 | 71 | 23.7 | 23.70 | 1 | 39 |
| Tue 10/29 | vs Louisiana | L 17-23 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Old Dominion | L 14-24 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Arkansas State | W 41-9 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 25 |
| Thu 10/3 | @ Troy | W 38-17 | — | 5 | 73 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ Sam Houston100 receiving yards · High volume | L 39-40 | — | 10 | 133 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 9/12 | vs Arizona State2+ TD | L 28-31 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs UTSA | W 49-10 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | — | 7 | 69 | 9.9 | 9.90 | 1 | 34 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boston College
2021-2023
Opening stop
- 2
Texas State
2024
Final stop
Season Progression
20212022202320242024
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Regular Season | Boston College | 212 | 64.9 | 15.8 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Boston College | 170 | 81.8 | 10.4 | -42 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Boston College | 210 | 72.7 | 12 | 40 |
| 2024 Postseason | Texas State | 807 | 84.7 | 19.2 | 597 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Texas State | 807 | 84.7 | 19.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Georgia Tech
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
60
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
70
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Sam Houston
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 88.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Postseason · Texas State
807 primary output · 84.7 efficiency · 19.2 usage
67.3
#2
2024 Regular Season · Texas State
67.3
807 primary · 84.7 efficiency · 19.2 usage
#3
2022 Regular Season · Boston College
45.7
170 primary · 81.8 efficiency · 10.4 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8293
Hendrickson · Pflugerville, TX
- Committed To
- Boston College
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,399
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.