Usage Score
20.9
Player Dossier
2022-2025Kentucky
Barion Brown
WR • 5'11" • 185 lbs • Nashville, TN, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Barion Brown reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64
Consistency
56.5
Season Value
57.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · LSU
22222323242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Kentucky • LSU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Barion Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · LSU. Barion Brown reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
LSU paired 532 primary output with 67.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2023 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Kentucky, LSU.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Vanderbilt
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2023 Postseason · Kentucky
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
41.5
Efficiency
64
Usage
20.9
Consistency
56.5
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 100. Ball State: 39. Unknown: 51. Akron: 19. Vanderbilt: 105. Florida: 37. Georgia: 7. Missouri: 18. Tennessee: 58. Mississippi State: 24. Alabama: 3. South Carolina: 30. Louisville: 48
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 3 by 100. Ball State: 3 by 86.7. Unknown: 6 by 56.7. Akron: 2 by 63.3. Vanderbilt: 4 by 100. Florida: 4 by 61.7. Georgia: 1 by 46.7. Missouri: 3 by 40. Tennessee: 5 by 77.3. Mississippi State: 4 by 40. Alabama: 2 by 10. South Carolina: 4 by 50. Louisville: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins45.3 · n=6 · +9.3 vs Losses
Losses36 · n=6 · -9.3 vs Wins
First Half51.1 · n=7 · +21.0 vs Second Half
Second Half30.2 · n=6 · -21.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Vanderbilt
Best efficiency game
100 vs Clemson
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Clemson100 receiving yards | L 35-38 | — | 3 | 100 | 25.2 | 33.30 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Louisville | W 38-31 | — | 2 | 48 | 17.5 | 24 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 11/19 | @ South Carolina | L 14-17 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Alabama | L 21-49 | — | 2 | 3 | 3.3 | 1.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Mississippi State | W 24-3 | — | 4 | 24 | 9.2 | 6 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Tennessee | L 27-33 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Missouri | L 21-38 | — | 3 | 18 | 8.8 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Georgia | L 13-51 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Florida | W 33-14 | — | 4 | 37 | 10.2 | 9.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Vanderbilt100 receiving yards | W 45-28 | — | 4 | 105 | 21.8 | 26.30 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Akron | W 35-3 | — | 2 | 19 | 6.7 | 9.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 51 | 10.6 | 8.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Ball State | W 44-14 | — | 3 | 39 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kentucky
2022-2024
Opening stop
- 2
LSU
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
2022202220232023202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 Postseason | Kentucky | 628 | 60.4 | 22 | — |
| 2022 Regular Season | Kentucky | 628 | 60.4 | 22 | 0 |
| 2023 Postseason | Kentucky | 539 | 64 | 20.9 | -89 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Kentucky | 539 | 64 | 20.9 | 0 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Kentucky | 361 | 69.4 | 20.3 | -178 |
| 2025 Postseason | LSU | 532 | 67.4 | 17.9 | 171 |
| 2025 Regular Season | LSU | 532 | 67.4 | 17.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145
Primary metric
145 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Ole Miss
88
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Vanderbilt
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Clemson
100
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana Tech
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · LSU
532 primary output · 67.4 efficiency · 17.9 usage
61.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · LSU
61.2
532 primary · 67.4 efficiency · 17.9 usage
#3
2022 Postseason · Kentucky
59.7
628 primary · 60.4 efficiency · 22 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.9586
Pearl-Cohn · Nashville, TN
- Committed To
- Kentucky
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,060
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 50 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.